Search for: "Ingram v. State" Results 61 - 80 of 198
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
7 Nov 2014, 5:52 am
  By our count, federal judges have trampled over state sovereignty with respect to the heeding presumption in no fewer than eleven states – Alaska, Colorado (despite contrary state-court authority), Georgia, Hawaii, Illinois, Iowa, Kentucky, Maine, New York (despite contrary state-court authority), South Dakota, and Wyoming.Finally, because various states have taken quite different approaches to whether a heeding presumption exists at all and… [read post]
10 Sep 2014, 2:20 pm by Kent Scheidegger
David Ingram reports for KTRK:"I shot my brother-in-law in self-defense and I shot my wife by accident," he told The Associated Press in a recent interview. [read post]
27 Feb 2014, 7:30 am by Doorey
 That law is easy enough to state, and the Court cites the Ontario decision in  Kieran v Ingram Micro Inc., [2004] OJ No. 3118 (ONCA) for the principle: A resignation must be clear and unequivocal. [read post]
11 Nov 2013, 3:28 am by Broc Romanek
Yet it remains an occasional favorite of elder argufiers when they have no authority, and no reasoning of their own, with which to impress the wide-eyed attenders of periodic assizes.- Taylor v. [read post]
13 Oct 2013, 6:50 pm by JaneAnne
Judge Calabresi’s comments on anchoring in his concurring opinion in United States v. [read post]
22 May 2013, 6:57 am by Rachel, Law Clerk
R v Cockell Urban Dictionary Finds Place in the Courtroom - NY Times Trial ends as judge determines whether NYPD’s ‘stop and frisk’ policy is unconstitutional Convicted of murdering ex-client, lawyer is fighting attorney disciplinary petition Rob Ford faces more calls to address crack allegations  Court rules bin Laden death photos can stay secret (David Ingram/Reuters) Michael Bryant calls the casino industry's bluff - Macleans.ca Brian Burke’s… [read post]
22 Apr 2013, 5:41 pm by Law Lady
LISA INGRAM, Appellee. 4th District.Civil procedure -- Sanctions -- Dismissal -- Trial court abused its discretion in dismissing case as sanction for discovery violations without making express factual findings demonstrating such a severe sanction was warrantedDEUTSCHE BANK NATIONAL TRUST COMPANY, as Trustee of MSAC 2007-HE6, Appellant, v. [read post]
1 Mar 2013, 6:15 am by Rachel Sachs
Other coverage continued to focus on some of the other amicus briefs filed in Hollingsworth and United States v. [read post]
18 Feb 2013, 12:44 pm by Neil Cahn
Ingram Jr., of Potsdam, served as attorney for the children. [read post]
17 Dec 2012, 2:30 am by INFORRM
See Jeff Jarvis here; Mathew Ingram here. [read post]