Search for: "Ingram v. State" Results 101 - 120 of 198
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
8 Jul 2012, 9:30 pm by Darren
South African case law that has referred to European decisions that have caused the UKIPO to summarise the Principles as they have been referred to above include Adcock Ingram v Cipla Medpro (Sabel v Puma), Laugh it off Promotions v SAB (Canon v MGM), Puma v Global Warming (Marca Mode v Adidas) and Cowbell v ICS Holdings (Canon v MGM). [read post]
29 Oct 2010, 2:53 am by Francis Davey
K&J had argued that a by the way statement made by Lord Templeman in Billson v Residential Apartments Ltd (No 1) [1992] 1 AC 494 to the effect that "I consider that the practice of ordering indemnity costs as a condition of granting relief is ripe for reconsideration" should be followed in preference to Chadwick LJ's statement of principle in Bland v Ingrams Estates Ltd (No 2) [2001] EWCA Civ 1088 at paragraph 14: "Third, the object of the court… [read post]
29 Oct 2010, 2:53 am by Francis Davey
K&J had argued that a by the way statement made by Lord Templeman in Billson v Residential Apartments Ltd (No 1) [1992] 1 AC 494 to the effect that "I consider that the practice of ordering indemnity costs as a condition of granting relief is ripe for reconsideration" should be followed in preference to Chadwick LJ's statement of principle in Bland v Ingrams Estates Ltd (No 2) [2001] EWCA Civ 1088 at paragraph 14: "Third, the object of the court… [read post]
9 Jul 2011, 7:14 am
In 1927 the United States Supreme Court decided Robins Dry Dock and Repair Co. v. [read post]
30 Mar 2010, 7:22 pm by cdw
”  The Alabama Supreme Court in Ex parte Robert Shawn Ingram reverses on postconviction appeal and remands as the State’s proffered order, subsequently adopted by the trial court, was not properly reviewed by the court below. [read post]
25 Jun 2016, 10:21 am by J. Ross Pepper
Two cases where defendants were equitably estopped from relying on the statute of limitations as a defense are: Ingram v. [read post]
25 Jun 2016, 10:21 am by J. Ross Pepper
Two cases where defendants were equitably estopped from relying on the statute of limitations as a defense are: Ingram v. [read post]
8 Jun 2017, 4:04 pm by INFORRM
If we’re keeping score, the District Court decision of DCJ Ingram remains the only New Zealand judgment to strike out a proceeding in its entirety (since other, non-tortious, claims by Ms X will proceed against the Attorney-General). [read post]
9 Jun 2010, 7:12 am by Anna Christensen
” At Slate, Radley Balko discusses Skinner v. [read post]
7 Jul 2010, 7:53 am by Adam Chandler
United States—the “honest services” case—has “no impact whatsoever” on its prosecution of Ring. [read post]