Search for: "Ink v. U.S. Government" Results 141 - 160 of 181
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
8 Jul 2011, 11:04 am by Bexis
With the ink barely dry on the Supreme Court’s recent decision that pharmaceutical detailing is First Amendment protected commercial speech, see Sorrell v. [read post]
10 Jun 2011, 1:40 pm by Howard Ullman
Independent Ink, Inc., 547 U.S. 28 (2006), in many cases they do just that. [read post]
10 Mar 2011, 12:51 pm by WIMS
According to the Chamber of Commerce, failing to pass these trade agreements along with the trade agreement with South Korea could cost us 380,000 U.S. jobs. . . [read post]
3 Aug 2010, 4:25 am by Dianne Saxe
[iv],[v] Still, it is good to see more action being taken to cut phosphorus. [read post]
1 Jul 2010, 5:20 pm by carie
”On September 9th last year, Stevens engaged in a classic version of advocacy-by-interrogation during the argument of Citizens United v. [read post]
17 Jun 2010, 3:25 pm by Larry Downes
  Or put another way, why is a federal government agency (limited, by definition, to enforcing it authority only within the U.S.) such a poor choice for the job, despite the best intentions of its leadership and the obviously strong work ethic of its staff? [read post]
15 Mar 2010, 10:14 am by Hilde
”On September 9th last year, Stevens engaged in a classic version of advocacy-by-interrogation during the argument of Citizens United v. [read post]
18 Feb 2010, 1:57 pm by Lyle Denniston
The state court rejected what it called “the obsolete reasoning” of two Supreme Court precedents saying that the Second Amendment did not apply to the states — U.S. v. [read post]