Search for: "Insurance Co. v. Transportation Co." Results 241 - 260 of 604
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
23 Feb 2015, 4:29 am by David DePaolo
Strip away all of the legal mumbo jumbo and the result is obvious.Interstate paid for insurance. [read post]
27 Jan 2015, 2:00 pm
Here, a California resident owned an apartment building in Arkansas that was insured by a Michigan insurance company under a policy the owner obtained through an insurance agent in Arkansas. [read post]
7 Jan 2015, 10:52 am by Maureen Johnston
Ambler Realty Co.; and (2) whether a regulatory restriction on the right to use one's property “must substantially advance a legitimate state interest” to satisfy the substantive requirement of due process, per Lingle, Nectow, and Euclid. [read post]
6 Nov 2014, 1:42 pm by Lorene Park
Supreme Court has ruled that violations committed either with knowledge or in reckless disregard of FCRA requirements could be considered “willful” (Safeco Insurance Co of America v Burr). [read post]
9 Oct 2014, 9:12 am
Brewster, 784 N.W.2d 264, 279 (Minn. 2010) (under statute limiting common-law collateral source rule “it would be inconsistent to allow courts to make deductions from an award for money paid by health insurers but not for the amounts an insurer negotiates as discounts”); Goble v. [read post]
18 Sep 2014, 4:29 am by David DePaolo
"Based on a 2013 decision from the U.S. 5th Circuit Court of Appeals titled Truitt v. [read post]
3 Sep 2014, 5:33 am by Mark Hartsoe
State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co., August 27, 2014, Knoxville Injury Lawyer Blog Knoxville Appeals Court Affirms Damages Award in Farragut Car Accident Lawsuit: Pyle v. [read post]
3 Sep 2014, 4:14 am by Kevin LaCroix
Supreme Court’s 1974 decision in American Pipe & Construction Co. v. [read post]
20 Aug 2014, 7:14 pm
(Pix (c) Larry Catá Backer 2014) Since 2010, I have been posting on the development  of a new course I have been developing for our first year law school students, "Elements of Law. [read post]
5 Aug 2014, 6:37 am by Mark S. Humphreys
Under the state's Labor Code, an employee traveling for business reasons using transportation paid for by his employer is generally presumed to be at work. [read post]