Search for: "Insurance Co. v. Transportation Co." Results 381 - 400 of 605
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
6 Feb 2023, 7:29 am by Leland Garvin
As noted in the recent case of Florida appellate case of Martex Corporation, et al v. [read post]
31 May 2012, 2:01 pm by Caitlin Padula
After you satisfy your deductible, you will be responsible for a co-pay for each prescription up until you reach the “donut hole,” when you will pay the full cost of the prescription until you have spent about $3,600, after which the insurance kicks in again. [read post]
11 Sep 2011, 12:49 pm by Michelle Claverol
Extra Expense Coverage pays for necessary additional expenses a business incurs that it would not have incurred if there had been no direct physical loss or damage to property at the described premises (or contingent premises if adequately endorsed) A good example of how distant businesses can be affected by catastrophes and yet recover under their own commercial policies is found in Archer Daniels Midland Co. v. [read post]
25 Aug 2019, 7:30 pm by Omar Ha-Redeye
Insurance Corporation, [40] The strict grammatical rule of construction whereby the restrictive clause is limited to modifying the immediate antecedent may give way when the context requires a deviation from the rule: Rex v. [read post]
30 Jun 2019, 4:00 am by Berniard Law Firm
In response to UniFirst’s argument that the foreman had apparent authority, a doctrine in which an innocent third party (Unifirst) could rely on the representations of an agent (the FDS shop foreman) when entering an agreement (see American Zurich Insurance Co. v. [read post]