Search for: "Insurance Company v. Baring" Results 41 - 60 of 179
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
15 Oct 2012, 12:35 pm by Misty Edmundson
"Insurance services" is defined as "services of an insurance company rendered by or on behalf of the insured, including such services provided to  others," which includes "[c]laims handling and adjusting."" [read post]
25 Jun 2013, 1:23 pm by Marcus Castillo
One of the hot topics at that conference was a case known as Howard v. [read post]
3 Nov 2019, 7:14 pm by Omar Ha-Redeye
AIG Insurance Company of Canada, overturning a decision on a summary judgment motion. [read post]
13 Apr 2017, 10:14 am by Gene Killian
The purpose, of course, was to drop the insurance company’s exposure to the bare minimum, because in later years, my client bought substantial excess coverage, as did many companies. [read post]
13 Apr 2017, 10:14 am by Gene Killian
The purpose, of course, was to drop the insurance company’s exposure to the bare minimum, because in later years, my client bought substantial excess coverage, as did many companies. [read post]
4 Mar 2016, 1:43 pm by Jennifer Jordan, JD, MSCC
Liberty Mutual Insurance Company caught my attention nonetheless as potentially interesting to our work comp readers so here goes. [read post]
6 Dec 2011, 6:29 am by Mark S. Humphreys
One aspect of these coverages was discussed in a 2004, Texas Supreme Court case styled, Old American County Mutual Fire Insurance Company v. [read post]
8 Mar 2010, 6:55 am by Mehmet Munur
While the court held that the electronic signatures used to sign the life insurance application survived summary judgment, the definition of the term Participant was vague and could not result in summary judgment for the insurance company. [read post]
8 Jun 2020, 8:32 am by Al Fowerbaugh
My colleague Andy Shapiro previously wrote about whether companies were covered by insurance for BIPA claims here. [read post]
15 Oct 2007, 8:32 am
Life Insurance Company of North America, is an interesting example of this type of case, and reflects two particular points: first, the continuing influence in this area of the law of the First Circuit’s 1990 decision in Wickman v. [read post]