Search for: "Insurance Company v. Chase" Results 61 - 80 of 213
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
9 Oct 2014, 9:12 am
Brewster, 784 N.W.2d 264, 279 (Minn. 2010) (under statute limiting common-law collateral source rule “it would be inconsistent to allow courts to make deductions from an award for money paid by health insurers but not for the amounts an insurer negotiates as discounts”); Goble v. [read post]
7 Jun 2019, 9:48 am by MBettman
(an insurance company was also a victim eligible for restitution when the company voluntarily paid a third party for damages caused by the offender.) [read post]
18 Mar 2016, 2:04 pm
We have written so much about Conte and innovator liability, we will cut to the chase. [read post]
3 Jul 2011, 4:12 am by Blog Editorial
AXA General Insurance Ltd & Ors v The Lord Advocate & Ors (Scotland), heard 13 -15 June 2011. [read post]
4 Sep 2012, 1:34 am by Kevin LaCroix
  Finally, In an August 21, 2012 opinion, Central District of California Judge James V. [read post]
22 May 2011, 4:02 am by Martin George
Some will see in this a welcome piece of common sense, entirely in accord with the manner in which the English High Court and Court of Appeal had addressed (albeit in mirror image) the same issue in the proceedings which the bank had brought: BVG v Morgan Chase Bank NA [2010] EWCA Civ 390. [read post]
11 Nov 2021, 4:30 am by INFORRM
The end of the gravy train But will we see now see an end to ambulance-chasing data litigation? [read post]
24 May 2011, 6:33 pm by Chip Merlin
(pg. 12) - A company employee adjuster, independent adjuster, attorney, investigator, or other persons acting on behalf of an insurer that needs access to an insured or claimant or to the insured property that is the subject of a claim must provide at least 48 hours’ notice to the insured or claimant, public adjuster, or legal representative before scheduling a meeting with the claimant or an onsite inspection of the insured property. [read post]