Search for: "Insurance Company v. Comstock" Results 1 - 18 of 18
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
9 Oct 2017, 9:01 pm by Joanna L. Grossman
In 1972, the Court went further and found in Eisenstadt v. [read post]
11 Apr 2012, 12:47 pm by Edward A. Fallone
If you are not very poor, and you lose your job, you can purchase an individual plan from an insurance company. [read post]
4 Aug 2011, 12:56 pm by Laurence Tribe
In the landmark case of Wickard v. [read post]
31 Jan 2011, 5:01 pm by Ilya Somin
However, Vinson is on strong ground in ruling that the mandate cannot be severed from the bill’s provisions forcing insurance companies to cover people with preexisting conditions. [read post]
31 Jan 2011, 12:53 pm by David Kopel
The mandate fails at least 2 of the 5 factors from Comstock. [read post]
13 Dec 2010, 8:47 pm by Ilya Somin
The best example is the regulation forcing insurance companies to accept customers with preexisting conditions. [read post]
17 Oct 2010, 8:04 pm by Randy Barnett
After all, this mandate is essential to Congress’s grandiose new scheme regulating private insurance companies. [read post]
26 Jul 2010, 9:08 am by Steven M. Taber
Announces Settlement of Actions to Enforce Payment Obligations for Cleanup of New Jersey Superfund Site. – Department of Justice News Release, July 22, 2010 Champion Chemical Company, Imperial Oil Company Inc. and Imperial’s two former officers have agreed to pay at least $1.4 million to resolve actions to enforce a prior agreement to reimburse cleanup costs incurred by the federal government at the Imperial Oil Company Inc. [read post]
30 Jun 2010, 2:55 pm by Tom Goldstein
Allstate Insurance Co., the Court held that state law cannot block federal class actions (a pro-plaintiff result) in an opinion by Justice Scalia (!) [read post]
17 May 2010, 10:14 am by Randy Barnett
Moreover, the argument for “necessity” is reasonably straight-forward: it is necessary to compel all uninsured persons into the insurance pool to pay for the increased costs being imposed on insurance companies by the Act. [read post]
25 Jan 2010, 12:49 pm by WIMS
He called it a "major victory for big oil, Wall Street banks, health insurance companies and the other powerful interests." [read post]