Search for: "Insurance Company v. Express Company" Results 1 - 20 of 2,051
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
6 Oct 2011, 11:06 am by Mark S. Humphreys
Prior to his death, Orange Love had been an employee of and worked for the San Antonio Compress Company, which carried compensation insurance covering its employees with Aetna Insurance Company. [read post]
17 Apr 2018, 12:56 am by Ashiq Hamid, trainee solicitor, CMS
Ashiq Hamid, trainee solicitor at CMS, considers the case of Gavin Edmondson Solicitors Ltd v Haven Insurance Company Ltd: On 5 February 2018, the Supreme Court began hearing the appeal by Haven Insurance (“Haven”) contending that it did not cheat Gavin Edmondson Solicitors (“Edmondson”) out of costs owed by six clients represented by Edmondson through conditional fee arrangements (a “CFA”) in road traffic accidents when Haven… [read post]
16 May 2011, 8:32 am
One of the most common problems expressed to the insurance law firm of Schlesinger Conrad, pllc in recent months is that the homeowner's insurance company is failing to provide Additional Living Expenses ("ALE") pursuant to the requirements of the policy. [read post]
9 Mar 2016, 8:25 am by Daily Record Staff
Contracts — Insurance policy — Express terms This case arises out of an insurance coverage dispute between appellant, Jonathan Feldman (“Feldman”), and appellee, Fidelity and Deposit Company of Maryland (“F&D”). [read post]
16 Jan 2023, 11:47 pm by Penny Biram
  Constantia Insurance Company Limited v The Master of the High Court, Johannesburg and Others (512/2021) [2022] ZASCA 179 [read post]
15 Mar 2018, 6:13 am by CMS
Clarke LJ held, applying the principles in Cory v Burr (1883) 8 App Cas 393 and Wayne Tank and Pump Company Ltd v Employers Liability Assurance Corporation Ltd [1974] 1 QB 57, where there are two proximate causes, one that is covered and the other subject to an exclusion, liability will not arise. [read post]
18 Nov 2022, 8:44 am by Kevin LaCroix
BNSF Railway Company[2] was the first fully litigated case against an employer for violating BIPA, in the wake of massive settlements involving tech companies including Facebook ($650 million)[3], Google ($100 million)[4], TikTok ($92 million)[5], and Snapchat ($35 million).[6]   Meanwhile, the Illinois Supreme Court in West Bend Mutual Insurance Co. v. [read post]
11 Apr 2012, 11:43 am by Stephen Neyman, P.C.
In response, insurance company representatives have expressed concern that such an ordinance would raise costs and place an unreasonable amount of responsibility on valet attendants, according to the Boston Globe. [read post]
20 Mar 2007, 9:29 am
I anticipate what IS or IS NOT said about the insurance company's participation will be the next issue the courts will need to determine. [read post]
2 Oct 2011, 11:03 am by Mark S. Humphreys
Also, the Texas Supreme Court in 1994, in the case, Celtic Life Insurance Company v. [read post]
8 Feb 2017, 6:30 am by Tom Pritchard
Yesterday the Supreme Court heard the appeal of insurance company, Capita Insurance Services Ltd, in a case that strikes at the heart of contractual interpretation. [read post]
14 Mar 2015, 6:10 am by Mark S. Humphreys
The United States 5th Circuit dealt with this notice issue recently in a case styled, Berkley Regional Insurance Company v. [read post]