Search for: "Insurance Federation of Pa. v. Supreme Court of Pa." Results 1 - 20 of 336
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
5 Apr 2017, 10:53 am by CJ Haddick
  There is a large body of case law in both Pa. state and federal courts holding that mere negligence is not bad faith, and that an insurer has the legal right to be wrong on claims decisions, as long as the decision can be supported by a reasonable basis. [read post]
20 Mar 2017, 5:00 am by Daniel E. Cummins
  The court noted that it would have to predict whether stacked UIM is available pursuant to Sackett, which the court noted was an issue before the Pennsylvania Supreme Court in Toner v. [read post]
15 Dec 2019, 6:57 am by Mike Worgul
The post PA DUI Law: Supreme Court Limits Birchfield appeared first on Worgul, Sarna & Ness, Criminal Defense Attorneys, LLC. [read post]
3 Mar 2020, 7:30 pm by Daniel E. Cummins, Esq.
Feb. 27, 2020 Beetlestone, J.), the Court followed the Pennsylvania Supreme Court's sweeping decision in Gallagher and likewise held that the household exclusion was eradicated across the board.The court in Stockdale rejected the insurance company's argument that the Pennsylvania Supreme Court Opinion in Gallagher v. [read post]
13 Apr 2023, 5:00 am
State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance, 256 A.3d 1145 (Pa. 2021), the Pennsylvania Supreme Court doubled down on its finding that the household exclusion was invalid by reaffirming its previous decision in Gallagher v. [read post]
30 Apr 2019, 8:13 am by Daniel E. Cummins
April 19, 2019 Kearney, J.), Judge Mark Kearney of the Eastern District Federal Court of Pennsylvania ruled that the January, 2019 decision by the Pennsylvania Supreme Court in the case of Gallagher v. [read post]
21 May 2012, 1:17 pm by Daniel E. Cummins
Richard Caputo of the Federal Middle District Court of Pennsylvania held that the Pennsylvania Supreme Court's decisions regarding Section 1738 of the Pennsylvania Motor Vehicle Financial Responsibility Law (MVFRL) in Sackett v. [read post]
25 Feb 2011, 7:37 am by Beth Graham
On Tuesday, the United States Supreme Court granted certiorari in Stok & Associates PA v. [read post]
5 Oct 2020, 5:30 am by Daniel E. Cummins, Esq.
The insurance company denied the claim based, in part, on the application of a Household Exclusion in the policy.The carrier argued that the Pennsylvania Supreme Court’s decision in the case of Gallagher v. [read post]
7 Jul 2016, 5:00 am by Daniel E. Cummins
   The federal court reviewed the stacking issue under the Pennsylvania Supreme Court’s decision in the case of Craley v. [read post]
14 Nov 2018, 5:00 am by Daniel E. Cummins
Munley of the Federal Middle District Court of Pennsylvania denied the carrier’s Motion for Summary Judgment in the case of Legos v. [read post]
19 May 2020, 2:17 pm by Daniel E. Cummins, Esq.
May 19, 2020 Ranjan, J.), Judge Ranjan of the Pennsylvania Western Federal District Court held that the Pennsylvania Supreme Court’s decision in Gallagher v GEICO, in which that court ruled that the household exclusion was no longer valid, did not apply to invalidate a household exclusion in this case where the insured had waived UIM coverage on a motorcycle insured with another carrier. [read post]