Search for: "Intellectual Property Group" Results 1 - 20 of 9,593
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
20 Feb 2018, 7:09 am by Peyton Patterson
(Feb. 19, 2018) — Archer Law’s Intellectual Property Group has been named “IP Group of the Year” by Law360 for the firm’s role in a groundbreaking U.S. [read post]
4 Jun 2012, 8:08 pm by admin
Howard Ullman (Orrick) has launched a new competition law group on LinkedIn (Competition and Intellectual Property Law): “The group focuses on intellectual property (IP) law and antitrust and competition law. [read post]
3 Jan 2020, 10:00 am by Mark Figueiredo
Categories of Intellectual Property As is clear from the definition of intellectual property (“IP”), the law doesn’t protect all products of human intellect. [read post]
9 Jan 2017, 10:02 am by Sergio Muñoz Sarmiento
There’s currently no law granting Mayan groups control over their own intellectual property. [read post]
13 Feb 2007, 8:15 am
A business group representing the music, movie and software industries recommended that China, Russia and over 40 other countries be added to U.S. government lists of nations that do not adequately protect copyrights and other intellectual property. [read post]
31 Jan 2020, 10:00 am by Brett Bunnell
During this time, your intellectual property (IP) can be exposed to many different people and businesses. [read post]
6 Feb 2007, 5:41 pm
The European Max-Planck Group for Conflict of Laws in Intellectual Property (CLIP) is a group of scholars in the fields of intellectual property and private international law that was established in 2004 with the aim of drafting a set of principles for conflict of laws in intellectual property and to provide independent advice to European and [...] [read post]
18 Feb 2010, 9:50 pm by Veronika Gaertner
Related posts:CLIP Principles for Conflict of Laws in Intellectual Property: First Preliminary Draft The European Max-Planck Group for Conflict of Laws in... [read post]
25 Apr 2009, 10:21 am by Douglas R. Griess
Here is my Intellectual Property 101 Presentation that I gave to the Creative Connections group in South Denver a few weeks ago. [read post]
16 Apr 2009, 3:20 am
Related posts:CLIP papers on Intellectual Property in Brussels I and Rome I Regulations The European Max-Planck Group for Conflict of Laws in Intellectual...CLIP conference: Intellectual Property and Private International Law As we announced in the last posting concerning the CLIP...Substantive Law, Technology and Intellectual Property in the Conflict of Laws Kimberlee G. [read post]
24 Jun 2008, 5:20 pm
"A 2005 study by USA for Innovation, a Washington group that advocates free trade, said that U.S. intellectual property is valued at $5.5 trillion, which is equal to 40% (forty percent) of U.S. gross domestic product. [read post]
25 Jun 2008, 2:19 am
  In many such transactions, intellectual property is a large portion of the collateral. [read post]
20 Jun 2012, 4:08 pm by Michel-Adrien
The online law blog/magazine has announced that it is adding a new group of intellectual property columnists.The new writers come from a range of law firms as well as from the University of Toronto. [read post]
17 Mar 2009, 9:00 pm by Content Admin
., co-Chairs of the Intellectual Property Practice Group at Archer, P.C., in Haddonfield, N.J., recently presented a special session on intellectual property law to members of the Entrepreneurs Forum of Southern New Jersey, which fosters entrepreneurial business development in the region. [read post]
1 Sep 2009, 8:14 am
The Intellectual Property Newsletter from Arnstein & Lehr’s Intellectual Property Practice Group discusses several recent cases that effect law pertaining to trademarks and other IP issues. [read post]
7 Jan 2018, 2:15 am by Press Releases
Haynes and Boone, LLP is proud to announce the promotion of three intellectual property attorneys to members within the firm's Intellectual Property Practice Group. [read post]
24 Apr 2017, 8:37 am
Houses of Parliament Source Wikipedia Jane Lambert The action arising from groundless threats has been one of the most perplexing features of our intellectual property law both for foreign owners of IPR in this country and their legal advisors (see Prince Plc v Prince Sports Group Inc [1998] FSR 21) and even non-specialist lawyers in the United Kingdom (see Brain v Ingeledew [read post]