Search for: "International Paper Co. v. United States" Results 241 - 260 of 742
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
30 Oct 2012, 7:44 am by John Elwood
United States, 12-5271, for yesterday’s grant in McQuiggin v. [read post]
14 Nov 2015, 5:18 am by Elina Saxena
They also explored how the United States can strike a “balance between privacy, security and the economic imperatives driving innovation” among other topics. [read post]
21 Jul 2019, 4:03 pm by INFORRM
United States Google is expected to pay a multimillion dollar penalty from the Federal Trade Commission over its handling of kids’ information on its popular video site YouTube. [read post]
6 Jan 2014, 6:45 am by Beth Graham
Supreme Court Upholds Agreement That Bans Class Arbitration Despite Costs Yesterday, the United States Supreme Court issued a decision in American Express Corp. v. [read post]
18 Mar 2019, 5:30 pm by Carley Roberts and Mike Le
Of note, these decisions run parallel to developments at the federal level whereby the fate of judicial deference to federal agency interpretation of certain regulations is pending before the United States Supreme Court. [read post]
19 Apr 2021, 7:48 am by Peter Margulies
To be sure, each of these legal features also provides needed relief for persons who can stake out a meritorious claim and in some cases—such as asylum—allows the United States to fulfill duties under international law. [read post]
9 Aug 2014, 8:49 am by Charles (Chuck) Rubin
” Next, it reviews the standards of “willfulness” as presented by the United States and taxpayer’s counsel, and as determined by the Court in the recent Miami, Florida case which was tried and decided by a jury in Miami, Florida in June, 2014, United States v. [read post]
19 Jul 2010, 12:25 am by Marie Louise
(Class 46)   Sweden Some culinary IP news… from Sweden (IPKat)   Taiwan Taiwan and mainland sign IPR Protection Co-operation Agreement (China Law Blog)   United Kingdom Trademark for IP TRANSLATOR refused by the UK IPO (IP Factor)  (Non-) British brands (Class 46) EWHC (Ch): Added matter, intermediate generalisation and a good day for cricket: Fosroc International Ltd v WR Grace & Co. [read post]
11 Nov 2019, 9:00 am by Colby Pastre
The following response was formally submitted to the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) on Friday, November 8 as part of a public review of their Secretariat Proposal for a “Unified Approach” under Pillar One, part of the ongoing work of the OECD/G20 Inclusive Framework on Base Erosion and Profit Shifting (BEPS). [read post]
9 Aug 2010, 12:58 am by Kelly
– All-Party Parliamentary IP Group (IPKat) United States US General On hiring an employee of your competitor: Bimbo Bakeries v. [read post]