Search for: "International Paper Co. v. United States"
Results 321 - 340
of 684
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
25 Oct 2017, 3:54 am
The velvet glove openly brandishes a knuckleduster: the explicit threat of legislation if the platforms do not co-operate. [read post]
26 Jan 2009, 1:20 am
For example, the 11th Circuit in United States v. [read post]
15 Aug 2024, 6:00 am
The book argues that the binary state-versus-federal-government model that is today taken to be the essence of American federalism does not correspond to the legal or political reality of the United States in the early nineteenth century. [read post]
23 May 2008, 1:03 am
: (IPBiz) Global - Copyright Musopen puts classical recordings, scores in public domain: (Ars Technica) Events 26-27 May : EU Workshop for mediators in IP disputes – Geneva: (IPR-Helpdesk), 27 May: Oliver Rivers to give short talk on ‘spurious precision’ – London: (IP finance), 28 May / 11 June: US PLI ‘Advanced patent licensing 2008: What you need to know before licensing your patent’ – New York / San Francisco: (Patent Docs),… [read post]
25 Nov 2009, 3:00 am
(IPKat) Maximising IP and intangible assets: new report (IP finance) (Innovationpartners) Protecting developing countries through the Trips Agreement: What is the real state of play? [read post]
7 Aug 2011, 11:24 pm
Zumbiel Co. [read post]
7 Aug 2011, 11:24 pm
Zumbiel Co. [read post]
6 Aug 2019, 5:45 am
Internationally, countries shifted from taxing tangible personal property: across the 36 Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) countries, only seven countries levy taxes on personal property: Austria, France, Germany, the Netherlands, Japan, the United Kingdom, and the United States.[5] Over time, the American personal property tax base was eroded as states provided exemptions for different types of TPP. [read post]
16 Aug 2011, 10:52 am
Lopez and United States v. [read post]
22 Sep 2022, 6:30 am
”[1] The constitutional sphere in the United States, the UK, Canada, and Germany are honorable members of that commonly explored (to put it mildly) “platinum club. [read post]
2 Aug 2008, 12:54 am
: (Holman’s Biotech IP Blog), Daiichi’s open offer for 20% in Ranbaxy awaits Sebi nod: (GenericsWeb), Australia/India: Strides shows thumbs up for Indian generic industry acquiring controlling interest in Ascent: (Spicy IP), Europe: Significant date ahead for EU Paediatric Regulation: (SPC Blog), India: Grave diggers, ‘immoral’ patent and the National Biotech Regulatory Authority: (Spicy IP), UK: Monster trade mark infringement case: court reveals its thinking… [read post]
12 May 2010, 1:04 pm
If the FCC gets its way and is able to grant itself new jurisdiction over broadband by declaring it a “telecommunications service” under Title II, with or without forbearance, all broadband connections will become subject to USF contributions.[12] According to the Organization for Economic Co-Operation and Development (OECD), the average subscription price for broadband in the United States in 2009 was $49.25 a month.[13] Applying the 15.3% contribution… [read post]
28 Jun 2024, 5:59 pm
They will discuss the evidence underlying the presumption, the standards for "internationally wrongful acts,” possible treaty violations, and the measures a state may take under international law in response. [read post]
12 Jul 2010, 5:46 am
(IPKat) United States US General Interview with White House ‘IP Czar’, Victoria Espinel (PatLit) When a school boy’s trick meets strangers in a train (or in the Air) – trade secrets and strangers: E.I. du Pont de Nemours & Co. v Christopher (IPKat) USPTO invites comments on strategic plan (IP Watch) (USPTO) US Patent Reform Unreasonable patent applicant delay and the USPTO backlog (Patently-O) US Patents June IP Update podcast: Bilski,… [read post]
16 Aug 2010, 8:42 am
The most substantial e-discovery costs arise from the attorney review process, regardless of whether that review is done internally by firm lawyers or outsourced to vendors in the United States or abroad. [read post]
28 Apr 2020, 6:30 am
Should the rules of constitutional amendment in Article V be interpreted strictly, even if this legalistic interpretation holds back the realization of equality embedded in the formative texts of the United States, including the Declaration of Independence, the Reconstruction Dismerberments, and the many franchise-expanding constitutional changes since then? [read post]
22 Mar 2010, 4:28 am
– EIPR article (PatLit) United States US Patent Reform Dr. [read post]
23 Feb 2011, 4:02 pm
The paper originally published by the Gazette of Law and Journalism Part 1 of the paper was posted on 22 February 2011. [read post]
16 Jul 2021, 1:29 pm
(S.E.C. v. [read post]
18 Nov 2021, 6:42 pm
”[2] G v H (1994) A good starting point in discussing the issue of who is a parent is G v. [read post]
