Search for: "International Paper Co. v. United States" Results 321 - 340 of 777
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
11 Apr 2017, 3:01 pm
It then considers the emergence of international standards as they inform regulatory efforts in states and enterprises and as normative standards in their own right. [read post]
10 Apr 2017, 2:57 am
In order to achieve the widest possible representativeness, we are pleased to launch this call for papers to receive expert papers presenting the vision of their various countries and/or continents. [read post]
25 Mar 2017, 4:55 am by Jordan Brunner
April Doss examined the Trump administration’s proposals to examine the social media accounts of visitors to the United States. [read post]
9 Mar 2017, 10:47 am by Ron Coleman
 I didn’t come up with that — the United States Court of Customs and Patent Appeals, predecessor to the Federal Circuit — did, in a well-known case called Bart Schwartz Int’l Textiles, Ltd. v. [read post]
24 Feb 2017, 9:00 am by Larry
Customs examined the factors set out in United States v. [read post]
1 Feb 2017, 9:00 pm by Dean Falvy
Now that he has been sworn in as the 45th President of the United States, Donald Trump is entitled to a four-year lease on the White House. [read post]
1 Feb 2017, 10:04 am by Jordan Brunner
  Luca Marzorati previewed the argument in John Doe v. [read post]
16 Jan 2017, 6:15 am by Shahid Buttar
EFF cited that decision 55 years later, when we filed First Unitarian Church of Los Angeles v. [read post]
2 Jan 2017, 12:18 pm by Barry Sookman
At a minimum the party to be bound must be shown to have been aware of the Terms and Conditions at the time of purchase: see Kobelt Manufacturing Co v Pacific Rim Engineered Products (1987) Ltd, 2011 BCSC 224 at para 124, 84 BLR (4th) 189. [read post]
3 Nov 2016, 9:32 am by Shannon Togawa Mercer
” Citing Lord Reid in Burmah Oil Co (Burma Trading) Ltd v Lord Advocate [1965] AC 75, the Court determined: “The prerogative is really a relic of a past age, not lost by disuse, but only available for a case not covered by statute. [read post]
20 Oct 2016, 6:42 am by Joy Waltemath
Finding that the employer did not point to any express contractual provision excluding the grievances from arbitration, nor did it offer forceful evidence that the parties intended to exclude them, the appeals court could not say with positive assurance that the arbitration agreement was not susceptible to an interpretation that covered the grievances (United Steel, Paper and Forestry, Rubber, Manufacturing, Energy, Allied Industrial and Service Workers International Union… [read post]
9 Oct 2016, 4:07 pm by INFORRM
“Denial“, a film based on Deborah Lipstadt’s book of the 2000 libel trial, Irving v Penguin Books and Lipstadt (see Gray J’s judgment, [2000] EWHC 115 (QB))  has been released in the United States. [read post]