Search for: "International Paper Co. v. United States" Results 481 - 500 of 807
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
3 Sep 2013, 3:30 am by Peter Mahler
Internal Revenue Code or minority shareholder rights under New York’s Business Corporation Law although, to be fair, neither of those laws (or country or state for that matter) existed in his time. [read post]
29 Aug 2013, 9:01 pm by Vikram David Amar
At a charter middle school in San Francisco where I used to serve on the Board, there hangs a banner bearing a message law students would be well advised to internalize: “Don’t pray for a light load; pray for a strong back. [read post]
11 Aug 2013, 11:11 am by Diane Marie Amann
Judge Wald was unquestionably one of the most respected and admired federal judges in the United States. [read post]
5 Aug 2013, 6:34 pm by Benjamin Wittes
More recently, in the 2008 military commission case of U.S. v. [read post]
11 Jul 2013, 6:19 pm by Larry Catá Backer
   "The Cooperative as a Proletarian Corporation: The Global Dimensions of Property Rights and the Organization of Economic Activity in Cuba" Northwestern Journal of International Law and Business 33:527-618 (2013).Abstract: Since the 1970s, the relationship between productive property, and the state and individual has been contested in Marxist-Leninist nations. [read post]
22 Jun 2013, 7:02 am by Benjamin Wittes
Congress responded by prohibiting the transfer or release of Guantánamo detainees to the United States. [read post]
3 Jun 2013, 1:46 pm by WIMS
Access THE QB-Lu research paper on CFC v. [read post]
18 May 2013, 5:30 am by Barry Sookman
Computer and Internet Law Updates for 2013-05-11 | Barry Sookman -> Computer and Internet Law Updates for 2013-05-11: RT @AusCopyright: News Alert – High Court delivers reasons f… -> Mandating disclosure of personal information for census purposes no Charter breach R v Finley, 2013 SKCA 47 -> UK company's spyware 'used against Bahrain activist', court papers claim ->… [read post]
10 May 2013, 6:15 am by Allison Trzop
Perry (the challenge to California’s Proposition 8) and United States v. [read post]
9 May 2013, 9:22 am by Benjamin Jackson
While gene patent opponents co-opted the Heller & Eisenberg paper as the primary theoretical basis for their claims of harm, the paper explicitly contrasted patents directed to fully characterized genes (which would clearly include Myriad’s) against patents to uncharacterized gene fragments (i.e., expressed sequence tags or ESTs). [read post]