Search for: "International Paper Co. v. United States" Results 501 - 520 of 808
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
9 May 2013, 9:22 am by Benjamin Jackson
While gene patent opponents co-opted the Heller & Eisenberg paper as the primary theoretical basis for their claims of harm, the paper explicitly contrasted patents directed to fully characterized genes (which would clearly include Myriad’s) against patents to uncharacterized gene fragments (i.e., expressed sequence tags or ESTs). [read post]
28 Apr 2013, 8:40 am
Reciting Seager v Copydex and Banks v EMI Songs, the former judge stated that 'where an inventor wanted to sell his idea for money, money is what he got'. [read post]
20 Mar 2013, 3:23 pm by Howard Knopf
 It should be noted that some believe that the execution on paper of an assignment of copyright to a Canadian entity will entitle it to block parallel imports in accordance with the Kraft decision. [read post]
18 Mar 2013, 6:30 am by Benjamin Wittes
  This is not something to be done “on the papers,” as they say in court. [read post]
1 Mar 2013, 6:24 am by Trey Childress
As many of our readers know, we are anxiously awaiting the United States Supreme Court’s decision in Kiobel v. [read post]
27 Feb 2013, 7:00 am by Benjamin Wittes
In the parlance of international law, the United States considers itself as fighting a “non-international armed conflict”—that is, an armed conflict against something other than another sovereign state. [read post]
27 Feb 2013, 4:20 am by Benjamin Wittes
  The government need only demonstrate that the surveillance targets “persons reasonably believed to be located outside the United States” and seeks “foreign intelligence information. [read post]
21 Feb 2013, 4:00 am by Administrator
Revolutionary change and the law of war The law of war is codified in the United Nations Charter, international treaties, the body of international case law, and in customary principles of behavior during times of conflict. [read post]
24 Jan 2013, 6:11 am by Victoria VanBuren
Strong, currently a Fellow of the Supreme Court of the United States for the 2012-13 term, is Associate Professor of Law at the University of Missouri and Senior Fellow at the award-winning Center for the Study of Dispute Resolution, having previously taught law at the University of Cambridge and the University of Oxford in the United Kingdom. [read post]