Search for: "International Paper Co. v. United States"
Results 541 - 560
of 684
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
17 Sep 2010, 7:47 am
Out of all the people busted for a sex crime above, how many do you remember seeing on the national media, news paper, or radio? [read post]
8 Sep 2010, 8:29 pm
” Urging en banc rehearing, the state argued that the Circuit Court decision conflicts directly with a Supreme Court ruling in 1987 — International Paper Co. v. [read post]
25 Aug 2010, 2:13 pm
But as the Supreme Court held in United States v. [read post]
23 Aug 2010, 4:15 am
See, e.g., Fitzgerald v. [read post]
16 Aug 2010, 8:42 am
The most substantial e-discovery costs arise from the attorney review process, regardless of whether that review is done internally by firm lawyers or outsourced to vendors in the United States or abroad. [read post]
16 Aug 2010, 8:42 am
The most substantial e-discovery costs arise from the attorney review process, regardless of whether that review is done internally by firm lawyers or outsourced to vendors in the United States or abroad. [read post]
13 Aug 2010, 5:30 am
United Steel, Paper & Forestry, Rubber, Mfg., Energy, Allied Indus. [read post]
9 Aug 2010, 10:33 am
Thus, the court cannot determine from defendant's papers whether the defendant asserted a failure of the plaintiff to state a cause of action or cited the Graves Amendment as a defense in its pleading. [read post]
9 Aug 2010, 12:58 am
– All-Party Parliamentary IP Group (IPKat) United States US General On hiring an employee of your competitor: Bimbo Bakeries v. [read post]
5 Aug 2010, 1:07 pm
Citing Stump v. [read post]
26 Jul 2010, 9:08 am
– Trading Markets.com, July 21, 2010 Consistent with Section 122 of the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act of 1980, as amended (“CERCLA”), 42 U.S.C. 9622(d), and 28 CFR 50.7, notice is hereby given that on July 16, 2010, the United States lodged a Consent Decree with 163 defendants (each of which is identified in the proposed Decree) in United States of America v. [read post]
19 Jul 2010, 12:25 am
(Class 46) Sweden Some culinary IP news… from Sweden (IPKat) Taiwan Taiwan and mainland sign IPR Protection Co-operation Agreement (China Law Blog) United Kingdom Trademark for IP TRANSLATOR refused by the UK IPO (IP Factor) (Non-) British brands (Class 46) EWHC (Ch): Added matter, intermediate generalisation and a good day for cricket: Fosroc International Ltd v WR Grace & Co. [read post]
12 Jul 2010, 5:46 am
(IPKat) United States US General Interview with White House ‘IP Czar’, Victoria Espinel (PatLit) When a school boy’s trick meets strangers in a train (or in the Air) – trade secrets and strangers: E.I. du Pont de Nemours & Co. v Christopher (IPKat) USPTO invites comments on strategic plan (IP Watch) (USPTO) US Patent Reform Unreasonable patent applicant delay and the USPTO backlog (Patently-O) US Patents June IP Update podcast: Bilski,… [read post]
18 Jun 2010, 10:10 pm
.: The cert. papers in the petitions discussed below are now available at the bottom of this post.] [read post]
18 Jun 2010, 12:14 pm
Co. v. [read post]
17 Jun 2010, 1:52 pm
Co. v. [read post]
15 Jun 2010, 7:50 pm
International Book Stores & Ors. [read post]
1 Jun 2010, 8:16 am
Desmarais is also registered to practice before the United States Patent and Trademark Office. [read post]
23 May 2010, 11:59 pm
Here is the abstract: The treatment of international parallel proceedings remains one of the most unsettled areas of the law of federal jurisdiction in the United States. [read post]
18 May 2010, 3:09 am
The Judge ruled that Unite did not tell its members about the number of spoilt ballot papers in the last dispute, and that as such it was arguably in breach of the strict requirements under section 231 of the Trade Union and Labour Relations (Consolidation) Act 1992, which states that as soon as is reasonably practical, a trade union must inform all those entitled to vote in a ballot of, amongst other things, the number of spoiled voting papers. [read post]
