Search for: "International Steel Co. v. U. S" Results 1 - 20 of 48
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
20 Mar 2023, 10:21 am by Minyao Wang
The parties also disagree on the significance of the court’s 1952 decision in Steele v. [read post]
25 Oct 2022, 10:46 am by Bernard Bell
This post assesses the Solicitor General’s argument, in New York v. [read post]
22 Mar 2021, 4:17 am by Peter Mahler
” In Frank v D’Ambrosi, 4 F.3d 1378 [6th Cir. 1993], the plaintiff and defendant were 50/50 shareholders and co-directors in an Ohio steel processing company which was dissolved on consent in 1989 after the defendant, D’Ambrosi, sued for judicial dissolution. [read post]
31 Jan 2019, 11:34 am by Schachtman
Steel foundries in the Johnstown areas. [read post]
6 Feb 2018, 7:24 am
It is mainly conceived as a response to the most pressing internal and external economic and strategic challenges faced by China, and as an instrument at the service of the PRC’s vision for itself as the uncontested leading power in the region in the coming decades. [read post]
11 Jul 2017, 1:01 am by rhapsodyinbooks
(AP Photo) Justice Jackson was known for a number of important opinions, including his concurring opinion in 1952’s Youngstown Sheet & Tube Co. v. [read post]