Search for: "Ira Lupu and Robert Tuttle"
Results 41 - 60
of 61
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
26 Jun 2008, 3:10 pm
Ira C. [read post]
21 Oct 2007, 11:00 pm
Lupu & Robert W. [read post]
8 Dec 2007, 3:35 pm
" Friday's Chicago Tribune summarizes other portions of the survey.The second report was The State of the Law 2007: Legal Developments Affecting Government Partnerships with Faith-Based Organizations , written by law professors Ira Lupu and Robert Tuttle. [read post]
26 Oct 2009, 12:10 am
Lupu & Robert W. [read post]
15 Aug 2011, 4:00 am
Lupu, Robert W. [read post]
6 Sep 2017, 4:18 am
” In a paper available at SSRN, Ira Lupu and Robert Tuttle suggest that the majority opinion in Trinity Lutheran Church of Columbia v. [read post]
2 Mar 2008, 11:00 pm
Lupu, Robert W. [read post]
19 Mar 2020, 3:40 am
At Justia’s Verdict blog, Ira Lupu and Robert Tuttle weigh in on Our Lady of Guadalupe School v. [read post]
19 Feb 2007, 10:03 pm
Lupu, George Washington University Law School Robert W. [read post]
11 Apr 2011, 4:00 am
Lupu, David Masci, Jesse R. [read post]
20 Jul 2020, 5:09 am
” And in the George Washington Law Review’s Supreme Court blog, On the Docket, Ira Lupu and Robert Tuttle analyze the court’s handling of the following question: “[W]hen is an entity complicit in acts that it deems sinful but are performed, or potentially performed, by others? [read post]
25 Feb 2019, 3:44 am
” At Take Care, Robert Tuttle and Ira Lupu argue that “both sides miss the central constitutional concern of the Establishment Clause,” which “separates the power of the state from that of communities of faith. [read post]
6 Jul 2017, 4:44 am
” At The George Washington Law Review’s On the Docket blog, Ira Lupu and Robert Tuttle discuss Trinity Lutheran Church of Columbia v. [read post]
2 Jul 2020, 3:42 am
At Take Care, Ira Lupu and Robert Tuttle warn that after Espinoza, “those who still believe that the Constitution precludes state involvement in promoting religious thought and experience have some work cut out for them. [read post]
30 Jun 2015, 4:00 am
Commentary comes from Leslie Griffin at Hamilton and Griffin on Rights, James Gottry at The Hill, Thomas Berg at America, Gregory Lipper at casetext, Zac Bears at The Double Standard, David Fontana at Slate, Jessica Mason Pieklo at RH Reality Check, Robert Tuttle and Ira Lupu at Cornerstone, Elizabeth Wydra at Reuters, Paul Horwitz and Howard Wasserman (in three posts) at PrawfsBlawg, and Ian Millhiser at Think Progress. [read post]
2 Jul 2014, 3:48 am
Chris Sanders, who at ACSblog argues that the home health-care workers in this case are getting “something for nothing”; Joan Krause, who at Hamilton and Griffin on Rights provides a health lawyer’s take on the decision; Jonathan Keim at the National Review’s Bench Memos blog, who characterizes the decision as “a solid victory for religious freedom”; Elizabeth Wydra, who at CNN maintains that “the implications of the ruling in Hobby Lobby extend far beyond… [read post]
9 Jul 2020, 3:53 am
At Take Care, Ira Lupu and Robert Tuttle maintain that, “[d]espite legitimate controversy over the application of the ministerial exception, Morrissey-Berru is a reassuring nod toward the continuity of a principle long rooted in the American tradition of church-state separation. [read post]
29 Jun 2017, 4:42 am
Commentary comes from Ira Lupu and Bob Tuttle at ACS blog, David Cortman in an op-ed for the St. [read post]
30 Dec 2012, 12:20 pm
As First Amendment scholars Ira Lupu and Robert Tuttle have written, the chaplains’ words are “a solemnizing event that ‘harmonizes’ with the religious activity of prayer,” but they are not a religious prayer. [read post]
25 Jun 2019, 3:58 am
” At Take Care, Robert Tuttle and Ira Lupu expand on a previous post for this blog on The American Legion v. [read post]
