Search for: "Irvine v. California" Results 121 - 140 of 399
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
14 Oct 2016, 4:20 am by SHG
Those who do aren’t trying to force anyone else to participate, but the plaintiffs in United Poultry Concerns v. [read post]
16 Sep 2016, 5:27 am by Edith Roberts
Long-time Supreme Court journalist Joan Biskupic shares her views on “the Supreme Court justices” and “the changing demographics of the Court” in a University of California, Irvine School of Law podcast. [read post]
12 Sep 2016, 11:00 am by Erwin Chemerinsky
Erwin Chemerinsky is Dean and Distinguished Professor of Law, Raymond Pryke Professor of First Amendment Law, at University of California, Irvine School of Law. [read post]
30 Aug 2016, 12:31 pm by Richard Hasen
Hasen is Chancellor’s Professor of Law and Political Science at the University of California, Irvine. [read post]
19 Aug 2016, 1:02 pm by Eugene Volokh
(Such permanent injunctions against speech that has been adjudicated as defamatory are generally available under California law, see Balboa Island Village Inn, Inc. v. [read post]
3 Aug 2016, 9:30 pm by Dan Ernst
[We grateful to Victoria Saker Woeste of the American Bar Foundation (vswoeste@abfn.org) for this full report of an excellent conference. [read post]
6 Jul 2016, 9:44 am by Gene Killian
I served as local counsel on that case for David Gauntlett of Gauntlett & Associates in Irvine, California.) [read post]
30 Jun 2016, 5:30 pm by Schachtman
Cole, Professor, Department of Criminology, Law, and Society, Director, Newkirk Center for Science and Society, University of California, Irvine – Alyse Berthental, Ph.D. [read post]
20 Mar 2016, 5:05 pm by INFORRM
Erwin Chemerinsky, a professor at University of California Irvine, said “I think this case establishes a very limited proposition: It is an invasion of privacy to make publicly available a tape of a person having sex without that person’s consent,” he said. [read post]
5 Mar 2016, 4:47 pm by Ginzburg & Bronshteyn LLP
  The reality is many attorneys and fiduciaries in the probate bar are still unaware of the monumental consequences, rights and duties that evolved from the California Supreme case of Giraldin v. [read post]
14 Feb 2016, 6:25 am by Howard Friedman
LEXIS 15237, Jan. 20, 2016) and dismissed complaints of a Muslim inmate about treatment of Muslims less favorably than Christians, and about a now-modified ban on growing beards.In Irvin v. [read post]
20 Jan 2016, 8:52 am by Abbott & Kindermann
         GENERAL CONSIDERATIONS California Building Industry Association v. [read post]