Search for: "Irwin v. Young" Results 1 - 20 of 39
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
3 Feb 2020, 6:36 am by steve cornforth blog
Shortly before my arrival, the Law Centre had taken the case of Irwin v Liverpool City Council to the House of Lords. [read post]
11 Feb 2021, 4:01 am by Administrator
In R v Suter, the Supreme Court of Canada explained collateral consequences in the context of sentencing as follows: a collateral consequence includes any consequence arising from the commission of an offence, the conviction for an offence, or the sen­tence imposed for an offence, that impacts the offender. [read post]
27 Mar 2014, 4:00 am by Administrator
(Toronto: Irwin Law, 2014) (This excerpt is published pursuant to a Creative Commons licence.) [read post]
8 Jan 2013, 1:26 am
See also the Irwin Mitchell article, below. [read post]
11 Feb 2013, 11:57 pm
Emily Marshall, family law professional support lawyer at Irwin Mitchell considers the possible implications of the Supreme Court’s decision in a commercial case on the forthcoming appeal in the Petrodel appeal, to be heard in March. [read post]
5 May 2015, 1:39 am
The society’s Education Secretary, Nick Buckland (Irwin Mitchell), tells all.Here's what Nick writes:"Addressing the ‘young-looking’ audience (flattery will get you everywhere), Judge Vajda first explained the “innate tension” that has existed since the Treaty of Rome between guaranteeing the free movement of goods (current Arts. 30-34 TFEU) whilst ensuring that “industrial and commercial property” is sufficiently… [read post]
29 Dec 2017, 8:00 am by ASAD KHAN
Rather than adults’ rights, two very young British children’s rights hung in the balance. [read post]
24 Feb 2012, 4:43 am by Anita Davies
Irwin Mitchell has been forced to defend its pricing policy after Lord Neuberger highlighted a case in which it charged six times the amount paid out to its client. [read post]
7 Apr 2019, 4:03 pm by INFORRM
On 3 April 2019 the Supreme Court handed down judgment in the libel appeal of Stocker v Stocker ([2019] UKSC 17). [read post]
10 May 2023, 4:00 am by Administrator
Fundamental Law for Journalists Author: Mark Bourrie Publisher: Irwin Law Inc. [read post]
24 Feb 2019, 4:23 pm by INFORRM
Lachaux v Independent Print, heard 13 and 14 November 2018 (UKSC) ZXC v Bloomberg, heard 27-28 and 30 November 2018 (Nicklin J) R (on the application of Privacy International) v Investigatory Powers Tribunal, heard 3 and 4 December 2018 (UKSC) Ali v Channel 5, heard 4 December 2018 (Irwin, Newey and Baker LJJ). [read post]
9 Sep 2015, 8:08 am by Martha Ertman
 Likewise, the 1879 Supreme Court case Reynolds v. [read post]
4 Jul 2011, 9:49 pm by Dan Ernst
The Fund was created in October 1918 by the widow of Stephen V. [read post]
1 Oct 2013, 11:41 am by Schachtman
Silica Co. in Support of Motion for Summary Judgment, in Irwin v. [read post]
17 Mar 2019, 5:35 pm by INFORRM
Media Law in Other Jurisdictions Australia ABC reports that South Australian Greens senator Sarah Hanson-Young might be cross-examined about her sexual history during a defamation trial against former senator David Leyonhjelm Canada In the case of Lotin v Gregor 2019 ONSC 1510 it was held that defamatory statements made one of the defendants accusing the plaintiff of stealing money in a telephone conversation and a text message and awarded damages of Can$2,000. [read post]
20 Jan 2019, 4:05 pm by INFORRM
Young, 2019 ONSC 326 the plaintiff was a doctor who had written to a local newspaper. [read post]