Search for: "Ives v. Swift & Company" Results 1 - 20 of 31
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
29 Apr 2013, 10:20 am by Jason Shinn
And if your company's HR policy is an impediment to swift action, it needs to be revised to avoid situations like that discussed below. [read post]
5 Jan 2019, 5:37 am by Florian Mueller
— Mike Swift (@Swiftstories) January 4, 2019How highly respected she is in the judicial community already became clear about two years ago when a multidistrict litigation panel had to decide on whether to consolidate FTC v. [read post]
24 Jun 2010, 12:58 pm
Defendant-petitioners in this case—executives of the publicly-held U.S. company Hollinger International, Inc. [read post]
., a “SWIFT ban”): (i) Bank Otkritie; (ii) Novikombank; (iii) Promsvyazbank; (iv) Bank Rossiya; (v) Sovcombank; (vi) Vnesheconombank (“VEB”); and (vii) VTB Bank. [read post]
26 Oct 2020, 11:18 am by Andy Foreman
[ii] Smart contracts have already been used in connection with real estate transactions,[iii] bank bonds,[iv] interbank transfers,[v] invoice financing,[vi] and homeowners, renters, pet, and flight-delay insurance. [read post]
6 Apr 2022, 7:13 am by Daniel Jin
Additional Russian banks have been banned from the SWIFT system and prohibitions have been introduced on: all transactions with certain state-owned enterprises; the provision of credit rating services to any Russian person or entity; and new investments in the Russian energy sector. [read post]
27 Jun 2018, 2:04 pm by MOTP
I Henry House purchased a house and surrounding real property from Jim Walter Homes, Inc. and Mid-State Trust IV in 1998. [read post]
17 Mar 2022, 9:04 am by Anna Carrier (BE)
Prohibition of SWIFT transactions with select Russian banks: Member States also agreed to prohibit the provision of specialised financial messaging services, which are used to exchange financial data (SWIFT), to select Russian banks, including: Bank Otkritie, Novikombank, Promsvyazbank, Rossiya Bank, Sovcombank, VEB, and VTB Bank. [read post]
5 Oct 2017, 8:05 am by John Elwood
Swift & Co., 323 U.S. 134, 140 (1944); (2) Whether the opinion of the U.S. [read post]
5 May 2009, 3:56 pm
(v) No period of time was offered to FRE at the meeting on 16 June to remedy the various defects in the properties of which complaint was made. [read post]
24 Sep 2014, 1:04 am by Ben
But Plaintiff does not have a monopoly on the idea of floating or airborne land, an idea that has been around since at least 1726, when Jonathan Swift published his classic Gulliver's Travels" and the judge also poitnted to Led Zepplin's album Led Zepplin IV and the track Stairway to Heaven, adding "Suspending a landmass is a predictable — if not common — way to make a vista more sweeping, breathtaking, and fantastical, and is plainly subject to both… [read post]