Search for: "J. Andrews" Results 141 - 160 of 3,408
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
13 Jan 2021, 1:27 pm by Scott Bomboy
The House of Representatives adopted an article of impeachment against President Donald J. [read post]
12 Jan 2021, 6:45 am by Guest Blogger
  That means that Congress does not need to impeach Donald J. [read post]
11 Jan 2021, 2:56 am by INFORRM
Legal Studies Paper No. 209, David Andrew Logan, Roger Williams University School of Law. [read post]
8 Jan 2021, 11:04 am by Hayleigh Bosher
Giancarlo Frosio (ed) Oxford Handbook of Online Intermediary Liability (Oxford University Press 2020)Daniel J Gervais (ed) Morality and Ordre Public in Intellectual Property (Edward Elgar 2020)Eva-Maria Kieninger (ed) Security Rights in Intellectual Property (Springer 2020)Anjali Vats, The Color of Creatorship: Intellectual Property, Race, and the Making of Americans (Stanford University Press 2020)And the Winner is: Giancarlo Frosio (ed) Oxford… [read post]
7 Jan 2021, 9:05 pm by Joshua Burd
Congress certified the electoral college vote ratifying President-Elect Joe Biden’s victory over President Donald J. [read post]
6 Jan 2021, 5:02 pm
Andrews, Rebel recruitment and retention in civil conflict Elizabeth J. [read post]
5 Jan 2021, 12:32 pm by Matt Gluck
” Atlanta’s top federal prosecutor, Byung J. [read post]
31 Dec 2020, 9:03 pm by Joshua Burd
” MAY Two weeks after President Donald J. [read post]
29 Dec 2020, 4:05 pm by INFORRM
Helpfully in November 2020 Saini J in Qatar Airways Group v Middle East News at paragraphs 263-306 of his judgment undertook a timely, but long overdue, examination of the rule in Diamond v Sutton. [read post]
28 Dec 2020, 9:03 pm by Series of Essays
Current Law Helps Shield Attorney General From Independent Review March 3, 2020 | Allie Gottlieb In the wake of the controversy over President Donald J. [read post]
28 Dec 2020, 4:31 pm by INFORRM
Ominously, in his recent judgment in Napag Trading Ltd & Ors v GEDI Gruppo Editoriale S.p.A & Anor [2020] EWHC 3034 (QB) Jay J noted: “Only the Second Defendant saw fit to raise a forum non conveniens challenge in advance of 1 January 2021 and the relevant EU regulation no longer applying… I refuse this application without prejudice to the Second Defendant’s ability to restore it at an appropriate time should the need arise. [read post]