Search for: "J. Remington" Results 21 - 40 of 40
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
3 Mar 2014, 2:51 am
 And if universities take the lead in responsible brand-building, perhaps they will set a good example for other commercial sectors in which goods and services are supplied under the limp banner of pathetic slogans that may mean a lot to their owners but which are rarely if ever considered to be brands or origin identifiers by the public at large.Merpel agrees: she recalls the admirable expression "limping trade marks", coined by Jacob J (as he then was) in Philips Electonics NV v… [read post]
11 Jun 2015, 10:46 am
Arnold J's ruling is noted by the IPKat here, and the original decision by the Hearing Officer, the seasoned Allan James, is here; the IPKat hosted a guest comment on this decision by young barrister Katherine Moggridge here. [read post]
19 Aug 2016, 5:53 am by Markus Lenssen
The Federal Court of Justice also refers to the corresponding understanding of the decision in re Improver Corporation v Remington Consumer Products Ltd (Hoffman J), [1990] FSR 181 Rn. 289 of the Court of Appeal of England and Wales and confirms that  German and English case law follow the same rules on this issue. [read post]
25 Oct 2016, 1:49 am
  Carr J recalled that one of his concerns when he represented Philips in the Philips v Remington litigation was that three heads (on the Philips shaver) would be said to add substantial value. [read post]
1 Jun 2010, 8:06 pm by Dan Michaluk
Remington Arms, 836 F.2d 1104 (8 Cir. 1988), a well-known American case that invites a kind of common law duty to retain records even in advance of anticipated litigation. [read post]
12 Jul 2017, 1:34 pm
The Patents Court (Arnold J. [2015] RPC 6) had decided that none of the Actavis products would directly or indirectly infringe the patent. [read post]
12 Jul 2017, 7:59 am
The Patents Court (Arnold J. [2015] RPC 6) had decided that none of the Actavis products would directly or indirectly infringe the patent. [read post]
23 Oct 2015, 10:30 am by David Kopel
On Wednesday I examined two aspects of Monday’s 2nd Circuit decision mostly upholding firearms and magazine bans in New York and Connecticut, in New York State Rifle & Pistol Assoc. v. [read post]
14 Mar 2013, 4:00 am by Administrator
Binnie J. quoted Improver with approval. [read post]
9 Aug 2011, 2:12 am by war
The Full Court (Greenwood and Tracey JJ, Buchanan J dissenting) has upheld Bodum’s appeal from Middleton J’s finding that the Euroline product was not likely to misrepresent an association with Bodum or its Chambord coffee plunger. [read post]
13 May 2021, 10:55 am by Jonathan Bailey
Additional Reading: I highly recommend reading this article by Michael J. [read post]
20 Sep 2010, 5:38 am by Russ DeMott
(That’s what we list on Schedule I and J, your income and expense schedules.) [read post]
9 Jul 2018, 6:13 pm by David Kopel
"Text, history, and tradition" methodology for Second Amendment cases Judge Kavanaugh noted the controversy over gun control, and cited articles by Judges Richard Posner and J. [read post]
14 Jan 2018, 11:32 pm
This contribution suggests that scents may be more easily registered in the near future as a consequence of the EU reform of trade marks and of some technological innovations.Scents are signs because they can convey information (Phillips Electronics NV v Remington Consumer Products Ltd (No. 1) [1998] RPC 283, 298). [read post]
1 Dec 2007, 7:15 am
L200/WCL Las Vegas NV 89146 Phone: (702)259-1903 Cerebral Palsy The Cerebral Palsy Foundation 2255 A Renaissance Drive, Suite 35 Las Vegas, NV 89109 Phone: (702) 270-2021 Cystic Fibrosis Nevada Cystic Fibrosis Chapter 2785 East Desert Inn Road, Suite 240 Las Vegas, NV 89121 Phone: (702) 383-8500 Fax: (702) 383-9700 E-mail: nevada@cff.org Web: http://www.cff.org/nevada.htm Developmental Disabilities State Developmental Disabilities Planning Council Office of Disability Services Department… [read post]
17 Oct 2013, 5:00 am by Bexis
For some reason, we recently found ourselves comparing our favorite defenses to our favorite rock bands. [read post]