Search for: "JAMES v. HOLDER et al" Results 41 - 60 of 86
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
30 Sep 2010, 11:44 am by Dennis Crouch
EFF et al.: Giving value to illegitimate patents creates perverse incentives. [read post]
1 May 2018, 7:38 am by Rachel Sandler
Visual Concepts, LLC et al, (No. 16CV-724) (S.D.N.Y. 2016) (https://www.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.uscourts.nysd.452890.1.0.pdf). [3]Jonathan Stempel, Lawsuit over LeBron James, NBA Stars’ tattoos in video games can proceed, Reuters Sports News (Mar. 30, 2018) https://www.reuters.com/article/us-take-two-lawsuit-nba-tattoos/lawsuit-over-lebron-james-nba-stars-tattoos-in-video-games-can-proceed-idUSKBN1H61MZ. [4] Noam Cohen, On Tyson’s Face, It’s… [read post]
28 Jan 2014, 11:18 am by Dennis Crouch
Feldman et al. count patent monetizers corresponding to CKS categories 2 through 5, and 7. [read post]
15 Oct 2010, 7:07 am by Matthew Kolken
The United States of America, et al., filed in the United States District Court for the Northern District of Georgia, Atlanta Division. [read post]
2 Mar 2011, 11:14 am by Lisa Larrimore Ouellette
Rochelle Dreyfuss (NYU Law) and James Evans (UNC Genetics and Medicine) tackle these question in the third paper in Stanford's Bilski symposium: From Bilski Back to Benson: Preemption, Inventing Around, and the Case of Genetic Diagnostics.Like Lemley et al. and Menell, Dreyfuss and Evans agree that the fractured Bilski opinions were uninformative. [read post]
2 Nov 2021, 8:26 pm by David Kopel
Rosanna Smart et al., The Science of Gun Policy: A Critical Synthesis of Research Evidence on the Effects of Gun Policies in the United States. [read post]
12 Sep 2009, 11:03 pm
Reines, Weil, Gotshal & Manges LLP, of Redwood Shores, California, for amici curiae Apple Inc., et al. and James W. [read post]
7 Jun 2013, 9:46 am by Amy Howe
James Sensenbrenner et al., who filed an amicus brief in support of the respondent in this case. [read post]
16 Jun 2013, 3:49 pm by Kedar Bhatia
James Sensenbrenner et al., who filed an amicus brief in support of the respondent in this case.Issue: Whether Congress’ decision in 2006 to reauthorize Section 5 of the Voting Rights Act under the pre-existing coverage formula of Section 4(b) of the Voting Rights Act exceeded its authority under the Fourteenth and Fifteenth Amendments and thus violated the Tenth Amendment and Article IV of the United States Constitution. [read post]
12 Mar 2012, 8:13 am by Ronald Collins
  I took the liberty of saying “yes” as in, for example, James F. [read post]
30 Apr 2013, 6:48 am by Sarah Erickson-Muschko
James Sensenbrenner et al., who filed an amicus brief in support of the respondent in this case.] [read post]
10 Jun 2013, 11:38 am by Kedar Bhatia
James Sensenbrenner et al., who filed an amicus brief in support of the respondent in this case.Issue: Whether Congress’ decision in 2006 to reauthorize Section 5 of the Voting Rights Act under the pre-existing coverage formula of Section 4(b) of the Voting Rights Act exceeded its authority under the Fourteenth and Fifteenth Amendments and thus violated the Tenth Amendment and Article IV of the United States Constitution. [read post]
21 Jun 2013, 4:46 am by Kedar Bhatia
James Sensenbrenner et al., who filed an amicus brief in support of the respondent in this case.Issue: Whether Congress’ decision in 2006 to reauthorize Section 5 of the Voting Rights Act under the pre-existing coverage formula of Section 4(b) of the Voting Rights Act exceeded its authority under the Fourteenth and Fifteenth Amendments and thus violated the Tenth Amendment and Article IV of the United States Constitution. [read post]