Search for: "JAMES v. HOLDER et al"
Results 41 - 60
of 77
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
Del. high court says undisclosed post-merger role made Tower CEO self-interested, board ill informed
12 Jul 2020, 5:40 pm
Haley, et al., No. 368, 2019, opinion issued (Sup. [read post]
30 Sep 2010, 11:44 am
EFF et al.: Giving value to illegitimate patents creates perverse incentives. [read post]
1 May 2018, 7:38 am
Visual Concepts, LLC et al, (No. 16CV-724) (S.D.N.Y. 2016) (https://www.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.uscourts.nysd.452890.1.0.pdf). [3]Jonathan Stempel, Lawsuit over LeBron James, NBA Stars’ tattoos in video games can proceed, Reuters Sports News (Mar. 30, 2018) https://www.reuters.com/article/us-take-two-lawsuit-nba-tattoos/lawsuit-over-lebron-james-nba-stars-tattoos-in-video-games-can-proceed-idUSKBN1H61MZ. [4] Noam Cohen, On Tyson’s Face, It’s… [read post]
28 Jan 2014, 11:18 am
Feldman et al. count patent monetizers corresponding to CKS categories 2 through 5, and 7. [read post]
5 Oct 2009, 7:08 am
James Parish, et al., v. [read post]
15 Oct 2010, 7:07 am
The United States of America, et al., filed in the United States District Court for the Northern District of Georgia, Atlanta Division. [read post]
2 Mar 2011, 11:14 am
Rochelle Dreyfuss (NYU Law) and James Evans (UNC Genetics and Medicine) tackle these question in the third paper in Stanford's Bilski symposium: From Bilski Back to Benson: Preemption, Inventing Around, and the Case of Genetic Diagnostics.Like Lemley et al. and Menell, Dreyfuss and Evans agree that the fractured Bilski opinions were uninformative. [read post]
7 Jun 2013, 9:46 am
James Sensenbrenner et al., who filed an amicus brief in support of the respondent in this case. [read post]
12 Sep 2009, 11:03 pm
Reines, Weil, Gotshal & Manges LLP, of Redwood Shores, California, for amici curiae Apple Inc., et al. and James W. [read post]
16 Jun 2013, 3:49 pm
James Sensenbrenner et al., who filed an amicus brief in support of the respondent in this case.Issue: Whether Congress’ decision in 2006 to reauthorize Section 5 of the Voting Rights Act under the pre-existing coverage formula of Section 4(b) of the Voting Rights Act exceeded its authority under the Fourteenth and Fifteenth Amendments and thus violated the Tenth Amendment and Article IV of the United States Constitution. [read post]
12 Mar 2012, 8:13 am
I took the liberty of saying “yes” as in, for example, James F. [read post]
19 May 2017, 12:23 pm
Appellant James V. [read post]
30 Apr 2013, 6:48 am
James Sensenbrenner et al., who filed an amicus brief in support of the respondent in this case.] [read post]
Non-final orders, jurisdiction, and fresh pasta with tomatoes, rosemary and braised kale with garlic
4 Mar 2012, 1:47 pm
ROUTH, Appellant, v. [read post]
21 Oct 2011, 1:31 pm
James G. [read post]
10 Jun 2013, 11:38 am
James Sensenbrenner et al., who filed an amicus brief in support of the respondent in this case.Issue: Whether Congress’ decision in 2006 to reauthorize Section 5 of the Voting Rights Act under the pre-existing coverage formula of Section 4(b) of the Voting Rights Act exceeded its authority under the Fourteenth and Fifteenth Amendments and thus violated the Tenth Amendment and Article IV of the United States Constitution. [read post]
21 Jun 2013, 4:46 am
James Sensenbrenner et al., who filed an amicus brief in support of the respondent in this case.Issue: Whether Congress’ decision in 2006 to reauthorize Section 5 of the Voting Rights Act under the pre-existing coverage formula of Section 4(b) of the Voting Rights Act exceeded its authority under the Fourteenth and Fifteenth Amendments and thus violated the Tenth Amendment and Article IV of the United States Constitution. [read post]
23 Dec 2010, 12:27 pm
Miesch, et al., No. 05-1076 (DB). [read post]
7 Nov 2011, 9:36 am
The case is Knox, et al., v. [read post]
12 Nov 2010, 5:16 am
Wednesday November 10, 2010 (sitting in Amarillo) Genesis Tax Loan Services Inc., et al. v. [read post]
