Search for: "JAMES v. HOLDER et al"
Results 41 - 60
of 78
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
7 Jun 2013, 9:46 am
James Sensenbrenner et al., who filed an amicus brief in support of the respondent in this case. [read post]
23 May 2013, 8:12 am
James Sensenbrenner et al., who filed an amicus brief in support of the respondent in Shelby County v. [read post]
21 May 2013, 7:49 am
James Sensenbrenner et al., who filed an amicus brief in support of the respondent in Shelby County v. [read post]
13 May 2013, 6:17 am
James Sensenbrenner et al., who filed an amicus brief in support of the respondent in this case.] [read post]
9 May 2013, 5:52 am
James Sensenbrenner et al., who filed an amicus brief in support of the respondent in Shelby County.] [read post]
2 May 2013, 9:27 am
James Sensenbrenner et al., who filed an amicus brief in support of the respondent in this case.] [read post]
30 Apr 2013, 6:48 am
James Sensenbrenner et al., who filed an amicus brief in support of the respondent in this case.] [read post]
5 Apr 2013, 9:01 am
James Sensenbrenner et al., who filed an amicus brief in support of the respondent in this case.] [read post]
7 Aug 2012, 5:02 pm
Eli Lilly and Company, et al., Civil Action No. 2:12-62 and Marston v. [read post]
12 Mar 2012, 8:13 am
I took the liberty of saying “yes” as in, for example, James F. [read post]
Non-final orders, jurisdiction, and fresh pasta with tomatoes, rosemary and braised kale with garlic
4 Mar 2012, 1:47 pm
ROUTH, Appellant, v. [read post]
16 Jan 2012, 10:02 am
WANDA GREENWOOD ET AL. [read post]
3 Jan 2012, 10:00 am
HOLDER ET AL. v. [read post]
7 Nov 2011, 9:36 am
The case is Knox, et al., v. [read post]
21 Oct 2011, 1:31 pm
James G. [read post]
7 Oct 2011, 4:18 am
Hise (Technology & Marketing Law Blog) Supreme Court confirms that a download is not a performance: ASCAP v United States (1709 Copyright Blog) (Ars Technica) District Court S D New York: Court nukes another mass defendant file-sharing lawsuit: Digiprotect v Does (Technology & Marketing Law Blog) District Court E D Virginia calls out copyright trolls’ coercive business model, threaten sanctions K-Beech v Does 1–85 (EFF) (Ars Technica) District Court… [read post]
18 Jul 2011, 6:13 am
” [Palm Beach Post via Radley Balko] On “unauthorized practice of law” as protective moat around profession’s interests, Britain does things differently [Gillian Hadfield via Andrew Sullivan; related, Larry Ribstein] Forthcoming book by Robert Crandall et al urges lawyer deregulation [Brookings] “The Treaty Clause Doesn’t Give Congress Unlimited Power” [Ilya Shapiro, Cato on Golan v. [read post]
13 Apr 2011, 3:59 pm
A.V.E.L.A., Inc., et al. [read post]
2 Mar 2011, 11:14 am
Rochelle Dreyfuss (NYU Law) and James Evans (UNC Genetics and Medicine) tackle these question in the third paper in Stanford's Bilski symposium: From Bilski Back to Benson: Preemption, Inventing Around, and the Case of Genetic Diagnostics.Like Lemley et al. and Menell, Dreyfuss and Evans agree that the fractured Bilski opinions were uninformative. [read post]
16 Feb 2011, 6:24 am
And finally, no mention was made of the 2009 Certificate of Relief From Disabilities which Caputo had received from his sentencing judge in 2009....Interestingly, counsel first argues that the United States Supreme Court’s recent interpretation of the Second Amendment to the United States Constitution in two cases, District of Columbia, et al. v. [read post]
