Search for: "JAMES v. HOLDER et al"
Results 41 - 60
of 83
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
14 Jun 2013, 7:38 am
James Sensenbrenner et al., who filed an amicus brief in support of the respondent in Shelby County v. [read post]
10 Jun 2013, 11:38 am
James Sensenbrenner et al., who filed an amicus brief in support of the respondent in this case.Issue: Whether Congress’ decision in 2006 to reauthorize Section 5 of the Voting Rights Act under the pre-existing coverage formula of Section 4(b) of the Voting Rights Act exceeded its authority under the Fourteenth and Fifteenth Amendments and thus violated the Tenth Amendment and Article IV of the United States Constitution. [read post]
7 Jun 2013, 9:46 am
James Sensenbrenner et al., who filed an amicus brief in support of the respondent in this case. [read post]
23 May 2013, 8:12 am
James Sensenbrenner et al., who filed an amicus brief in support of the respondent in Shelby County v. [read post]
21 May 2013, 7:49 am
James Sensenbrenner et al., who filed an amicus brief in support of the respondent in Shelby County v. [read post]
13 May 2013, 6:17 am
James Sensenbrenner et al., who filed an amicus brief in support of the respondent in this case.] [read post]
9 May 2013, 5:52 am
James Sensenbrenner et al., who filed an amicus brief in support of the respondent in Shelby County.] [read post]
2 May 2013, 9:27 am
James Sensenbrenner et al., who filed an amicus brief in support of the respondent in this case.] [read post]
30 Apr 2013, 6:48 am
James Sensenbrenner et al., who filed an amicus brief in support of the respondent in this case.] [read post]
5 Apr 2013, 9:01 am
James Sensenbrenner et al., who filed an amicus brief in support of the respondent in this case.] [read post]
18 Mar 2013, 6:30 am
And most informed observers would agree, I think, that as a result of our government’s counterterrorism efforts, spanning both the Bush and Obama Administrations, and which have included targeted lethal force against known individuals, the U.S. homeland is safer today from a terrorist attack launched by al Qaeda from overseas. [read post]
7 Aug 2012, 5:02 pm
Eli Lilly and Company, et al., Civil Action No. 2:12-62 and Marston v. [read post]
12 Mar 2012, 8:13 am
I took the liberty of saying “yes” as in, for example, James F. [read post]
Non-final orders, jurisdiction, and fresh pasta with tomatoes, rosemary and braised kale with garlic
4 Mar 2012, 1:47 pm
ROUTH, Appellant, v. [read post]
16 Jan 2012, 10:02 am
WANDA GREENWOOD ET AL. [read post]
3 Jan 2012, 10:00 am
HOLDER ET AL. v. [read post]
7 Nov 2011, 9:36 am
The case is Knox, et al., v. [read post]
21 Oct 2011, 1:31 pm
James G. [read post]
7 Oct 2011, 4:18 am
Hise (Technology & Marketing Law Blog) Supreme Court confirms that a download is not a performance: ASCAP v United States (1709 Copyright Blog) (Ars Technica) District Court S D New York: Court nukes another mass defendant file-sharing lawsuit: Digiprotect v Does (Technology & Marketing Law Blog) District Court E D Virginia calls out copyright trolls’ coercive business model, threaten sanctions K-Beech v Does 1–85 (EFF) (Ars Technica) District Court… [read post]
8 Aug 2011, 12:40 am
Donald Rumsfeld, et al (Case No. 06 C 6964) http://chicago.indymedia.org/usermedia/application/5/donald_vance_v_donald_rumsfeld.pdf [read post]
