Search for: "JAMES v. HOLDER et al"
Results 61 - 80
of 87
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
10 Jun 2013, 11:38 am
James Sensenbrenner et al., who filed an amicus brief in support of the respondent in this case.Issue: Whether Congress’ decision in 2006 to reauthorize Section 5 of the Voting Rights Act under the pre-existing coverage formula of Section 4(b) of the Voting Rights Act exceeded its authority under the Fourteenth and Fifteenth Amendments and thus violated the Tenth Amendment and Article IV of the United States Constitution. [read post]
21 Jun 2013, 4:46 am
James Sensenbrenner et al., who filed an amicus brief in support of the respondent in this case.Issue: Whether Congress’ decision in 2006 to reauthorize Section 5 of the Voting Rights Act under the pre-existing coverage formula of Section 4(b) of the Voting Rights Act exceeded its authority under the Fourteenth and Fifteenth Amendments and thus violated the Tenth Amendment and Article IV of the United States Constitution. [read post]
23 Dec 2010, 12:27 pm
Miesch, et al., No. 05-1076 (DB). [read post]
7 Nov 2011, 9:36 am
The case is Knox, et al., v. [read post]
12 Nov 2010, 5:16 am
Wednesday November 10, 2010 (sitting in Amarillo) Genesis Tax Loan Services Inc., et al. v. [read post]
16 Jan 2012, 10:02 am
WANDA GREENWOOD ET AL. [read post]
7 Oct 2011, 4:18 am
Hise (Technology & Marketing Law Blog) Supreme Court confirms that a download is not a performance: ASCAP v United States (1709 Copyright Blog) (Ars Technica) District Court S D New York: Court nukes another mass defendant file-sharing lawsuit: Digiprotect v Does (Technology & Marketing Law Blog) District Court E D Virginia calls out copyright trolls’ coercive business model, threaten sanctions K-Beech v Does 1–85 (EFF) (Ars Technica) District Court… [read post]
16 Feb 2011, 6:24 am
And finally, no mention was made of the 2009 Certificate of Relief From Disabilities which Caputo had received from his sentencing judge in 2009....Interestingly, counsel first argues that the United States Supreme Court’s recent interpretation of the Second Amendment to the United States Constitution in two cases, District of Columbia, et al. v. [read post]
25 Jun 2013, 11:31 am
James Sensenbrenner et al., who filed an amicus brief in support of the respondent in this case. [read post]
7 Oct 2009, 7:54 am
New York Mercantile Exchange, Inc. et al. [read post]
24 Jul 2018, 7:18 am
Frye [9] and Lafler v. [read post]
5 Sep 2014, 11:29 am
Thus, for instance, Cao, et al., Willingness to Shoot: Public Attitudes Toward Defensive Gun Use, 27 Am. [read post]
26 Dec 2016, 4:30 am
Well Marie-Andree cited that 1879 case Feist Publications, Inc. v. [read post]
20 Oct 2020, 8:01 am
Breibart News Network, LLC et. al. [read post]
20 Oct 2020, 8:01 am
Breibart News Network, LLC et. al. [read post]
20 Oct 2020, 8:01 am
Breibart News Network, LLC et. al. [read post]
20 Oct 2020, 8:01 am
Breibart News Network, LLC et. al. [read post]
30 Dec 2018, 3:03 am
Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit in Folkens v Wyland. [read post]
26 Apr 2009, 11:36 am
The Prime Minister of Canada et al., Federal Court Judge James W. [read post]
30 Jul 2018, 10:44 am
(Builds on scholars such as Sean Seymore and Ben Roin; see also Krieger et al. on drug novelty. [read post]
