Search for: "JAN-PRO FRANCHISING INTERNATIONAL, INC. " Results 1 - 20 of 33
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
13 Jan 2021, 11:55 am by H. Scott Leviant
JAN-PRO FRANCHISING INTERNATIONAL, INC., Supreme Court Case No. [read post]
24 Aug 2020, 9:58 am by Kaufman Dolowich Voluck
Jan-Pro Franchising International Inc., according to Katherine Catlos, a partner in Kaufman Dolowich & Voluck LLP’s San Francisco office. [read post]
15 May 2019, 4:30 am by John Gotaskie
Jan-Pro Franchising International, is the latest front in the joint employer battle. [read post]
31 Jul 2019, 5:08 am by James McQuade
Jan-Pro Franchising International, Inc., and ordered that it would certify to the California Supreme Court the question of whether the worker classification test articulated in Dynamex Operations West v. [read post]
Jan-Pro Franchising International, Inc., the California Supreme Court has concluded that Dynamex indeed applies retroactively. [read post]
14 Oct 2019, 7:00 am by Joseph S. Persoff
Jan-Pro Franchising International, the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals previously found the Dynamex decision applies retroactively, but subsequently withdrew that opinion and certified the question to the California Supreme Court, where the request is now under consideration. [read post]
25 Aug 2022, 4:12 am by Mark Tabakman
Jan-Pro Franchising International Inc and was filed in federal court in the Northern District of California. [read post]
2 Jun 2017, 2:56 am by Robin Shea
A federal judge in California ruled that Jan-Pro Franchising International, Inc., was not an “employer” of its subfranchisees and also had not engaged in any wrongdoing with respect to the subfranchisees. [read post]
Jan-Pro Franchising International, Inc., the defendant – an international janitorial cleaning business — was awarded summary judgment on minimum wage and overtime claims stemming from allegations that janitors had been misclassified as independent contractors as part of its “three-tier” franchising model. [read post]
12 Feb 2021, 2:02 pm by The Nourmand Law Firm, APC
Jan-Pro Franchising International, Inc., the court held that the Dynamex ruling should be applied retroactively. [read post]
15 Jan 2021, 10:21 am by HRWatchdog
Jan-Pro Franchising International, Inc. that Dynamex is retroactive because the decision did not change any “settled rule” about what test applied to the Wage Orders and doing so is not “improper or unfair” to employers. [read post]