Search for: "JANE DOE, " Results 81 - 100 of 3,569
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
24 Sep 2023, 8:00 pm by Sabrina I. Pacifici
He’s just a dude on the web,” says Jane Andrew, an expert on data breaches at the University of Sydney. [read post]
20 Sep 2023, 5:37 am by Peter S. Lubin and Patrick Austermuehle
Many of those who do report it go by Jane Doe to protect their identity and avoid some of the abuse and death threats that get aimed at anyone who claims they were sexually assaulted. [read post]
19 Sep 2023, 6:07 am by Eugene Volokh
An unincorporated association, the Concerned Jewish Parents and Teachers of Los Angeles, along with six individuals using the pseudonyms Jane or John Doe ("Doe plaintiffs") initiated this action …. [read post]
17 Sep 2023, 5:01 am by SHG
The woman, who has been called Jane Doe in the defamation case, did not respond to a request for an interview. [read post]
10 Sep 2023, 9:03 am by David J. Halberg, Esq.
Jane Doe In this 2017 case, Florida’s 2nd District Court of Appeal weighed in on a summary judgment request by a health care facility accused on two counts of failure to protect a patient from sexual assault by an employee. [read post]
7 Sep 2023, 5:17 am by Eugene Volokh
The Court emphasized that the fact that the organization's intent was "to exercise a coercive impact on [the broker] does not remove" the First Amendment's protections. [read post]
30 Aug 2023, 5:01 am by Nicholas Nugent
Classic Content Moderation In the typical, classic scenario, when a website takes adverse action against a user or her content, it does so because the user has violated the provider's terms of service through her onsite content or conduct. [read post]
29 Aug 2023, 5:37 am by Nicholas Nugent
In the end, I think Jane Bambauer has the best take on the issue when she says that "there are no close analogies in First Amendment precedent for internet platforms. [read post]
24 Aug 2023, 12:12 pm by Eugene Volokh
Pa.): Plaintiff Jane Doe … [sued] to address purported violations of her constitutional rights arising from an incident with a male student, A.M., during the school day at Pine-Richland High School. [read post]
17 Aug 2023, 10:19 am by Eugene Volokh
The inquiry is setting-specific: that a statement may be capable of objective verification in some contexts does not make it an objectively verifiable fact in every context. [read post]
14 Aug 2023, 2:47 pm by Ryan Goodman
The apparently inadvertent posting of the docket entry does not appear to indicate any nefarious action. [read post]
7 Aug 2023, 7:51 am by Robert Guest
The lawyer’s presence ensured that Doe’s rights were protected and that proper procedures were followed. [read post]
6 Aug 2023, 10:00 pm by Merpel McKitten
‘Developments in IP Policy, Practice, and Literature’I am not sure what the difference between the titles of Parts 1 and 5 is since all the contributors are KatFriends, and only one essay in Part 5 deals with actual literature, which is Jane Austen’s controversial third novel ‘Mansfield Park’. [read post]
1 Aug 2023, 12:53 pm by Second Circuit Civil Rights Blog
This is an unpleasant case, but the facts are that the plaintiff, Jane Doe, alleges that she was repeatedly raped and sexually abused by an Immigration and Customs (ICE) officer working for the Department of Homeland Security, and that the defendant used threats of violence and deportation to maintain his control over her. [read post]
31 Jul 2023, 4:12 pm by Blair & Kim, PLLC
According to the court’s opinion, “Jane Doe” accused the plaintiff of sexual misconduct in disciplinary proceedings conducted by the Ivy League university they both attended. [read post]
27 Jul 2023, 8:18 am by David Pocklington
The review was commissioned by the National Safeguarding Team, NST, and carried out by Jane Humphreys, a Senior Social Care Consultant, and previous Director of Children’s and Adult’s Services with a career spanning more than 30 years. [read post]
25 Jul 2023, 7:39 am by Eugene Volokh
In this particular case, where defendant Sidar has already been determined to be liable because of his refusal to provide a DNA sample, there may be reason for this Court to be less concerned about his interests than about Jane Doe's interests. [read post]