Search for: "JOHNSON v. FORD MOTOR CO" Results 1 - 20 of 52
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
3 Jul 2014, 2:35 pm by Steve Bainbridge
My friend Lyman Johnson seems to think so: Justice Alito, for the Court, rejected the view that business corporations must (and do) singularly act to make money, even as he acknowledged making... [[ This is a content summary only. [read post]
25 Aug 2020, 8:44 am
Ford Motor Co., 46 Cal.App.5th 493 (2020), noting "we feel publication will facilitate appellate discussion in case we have it wrong. [read post]
2 Aug 2013, 7:28 am by Joy Waltemath
Despite having not filed their own EEOC charges, four African-American Ford employees could advance Title VII claims asserting that they suffered race bias and were retaliated against after their coworker filed an EEOC charge on behalf of herself and “a class of Black employees,” a federal district court in Illinois ruled, denying Ford’s motion to dismiss (Rogers v Ford Motor Co, July 26, 2013, Gottschall, J). [read post]
4 Sep 2015, 7:52 am by Sean Wajert
Ford Motor Co., 362 Ark. 317, 327-328, 208 S.W.3d 153 (2005); Tietsworth v. [read post]
7 Nov 2014, 5:52 am
American Honda Motor Co., 505 So.2d 358, 361 (Ala. 1987) (cited in Deere). [read post]
27 Feb 2007, 6:02 am
Ford Motor Co., 113 P.3d 82, 94-95 (Cal. 2005) (rejecting "aggregate disgorgement"); Engle v. [read post]
27 Sep 2010, 5:50 am by David G. Badertscher
VerdiKINGS COUNTYMotor Vehicles Defendant Entitled to Partial Refund of Lease Payments for Deprivation of Use of Vehicle Ford Motor Credit Co. [read post]
18 Feb 2018, 8:24 am by Lawrence B. Ebert
Ford Motor Co., 849 F.2d 460 (9th Cir.1988), this court rejected Bette Midler's section 3344 claim concerning a Ford television commercial in which a Midler "sound-alike" sang a song which Midler had made famous. [read post]
18 Apr 2011, 3:31 am by John Day
Ford Motor Co., 461 F.3d 557, 566 (5th Cir. 2006) (“When the demonstrative evidence is offered only as an illustration of general scientific principles, not as a reenactment of disputed events, it need not pass the substantial similarity test.”);  and McKnight ex rel. [read post]