Search for: "JOHNSON v. NEW JERSEY" Results 1 - 20 of 543
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
20 Feb 2013, 7:00 am by Darren
  The post New Jersey Jury Deciding Fate of Johnson & Johnson Ethicon’s Transvaginal Prolift appeared first on . [read post]
10 May 2022, 11:12 am by CrimProf BlogEditor
Thea Johnson and Emily Arvizu (Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey - Rutgers Law School and Perkins Thompson, P.A.) have posted Proving Prejudice After Lee v. [read post]
30 Sep 2009, 11:37 am by Bonny Rafel
In the third of recent decisions in New Jersey District Court regarding Long Term Disability claims, "Dunn v. [read post]
25 Feb 2013, 8:51 am by admin
As noted previously, here is a previous update of this transvaginal mesh implant case: New Jersey Prolift Trial The post New Jersey Jury Gives Verdict In Favor of Plaintiff for $3.35 Million In Compensatory Damages In Tranvaginal Mesh Implant Trial appeared first on . [read post]
26 Feb 2016, 10:56 am by Paul Pfeifer
Approximately one thousand cases have reportedly been filed in a state court in Missouri and approximately two hundred cases have been filed in New Jersey. [read post]
12 Sep 2012, 6:14 pm by Mandour & Associates
IPNews® - Johnson & Johnson unit Janssen Pharmaceuticals Inc. won a major patent infringement victory Tuesday when a New Jersey federal judge held that its patent for the popular birth control drug Ortho Tri-Cyclen Lo is valid. [read post]
7 May 2011, 1:25 pm
Did DePuy Orthopaedics, subsidiary of New Jersey-based Johnson & Johnson, knowingly sell defective hip implant devices? [read post]
18 Jan 2013, 7:39 am by Calvin Massey
The New Jersey town of West New York is contemplating a ban on the exhibition of flags, banners, and pennants. [read post]
27 Feb 2014, 3:21 pm by Lauren Koster Beaver
  Luckily, in the recent published decision (precedential) Johnson v. [read post]
9 Sep 2013, 11:11 am
Ethicon, Inc., New Jersey's Appellate Division ruled that line of cases is inconsistent with the way the New Jersey Supreme Court has directed courts to interpret CEPA. [read post]