Search for: "JOHNSON v. VIRGINIA" Results 61 - 80 of 650
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
16 Nov 2019, 11:28 am by Randall Hodgkinson
After review of SCOTUS precedent (and other courts' interpretation of that precedent), the KSC concluded that Virginia v. [read post]
9 Sep 2019, 1:17 pm by Mikhaila Fogel
Quinta Jurecic posted the government and President Trump’s motion to dismiss in House Ways and Means Committee v. [read post]
24 Aug 2019, 6:30 am by Dan Ernst
Department of Commerce (nikkikalbing@gmail.com) The Future of Law in British Africa on the Eve of IndependenceRabiat Akande, Harvard Law School (oakande@sjd.law.harvard.edu) Marginalizing "Secularism," Decolonizing the State: Missionary Advocacy for Religious Freedom in British Colonial Northern Nigeria, 1945-1960Terence Mashingaidze, Midlands State University, Zimbabwe (mashingaidzet@staff.msu.ac.zw) Constitutionalism and Ritual Controversies in a Zimbabwean Chiefdom,… [read post]
11 Jul 2019, 8:00 am by Kevin Kaufman
Supreme Court’s decision in South Dakota v. [read post]
7 Jul 2019, 4:23 pm by INFORRM
The Guardian had an article “Boris Johnson team accused of breaching data protection laws”. [read post]
26 Jun 2019, 8:52 am by Casey Hamm
Adam Guenthner Adelina Jaurigue Adelina Jaurigue Adilene Cota Adria avila Adrian Garcia Akeyla White Alexia Martinez Alicia Elliott Alina Ramirez Allison Labenberg Allison Ujihara Alva Monreal Alyssa Arellano Amanda Basaldua Amanda Harakal Amanda Harbison Amanda Knight Amanda Knutson Amanda Morris Amanda Mullon Amanda Soderman Amber Defoe Amy DeWitt Amy Klein Amy Wilson Andrea Rickard Andrea sera Andrea Trias Angela Cisneros Angela Habinek Angela Lopez Angela Saltz Angela Soto Angela V. [read post]
4 Jun 2019, 9:30 pm by Mitra Sharafi
’ Jon Connolly, Tom Johnson, Lena Salaymeh, reminded us of normativity of legal field, that makes interdisciplinary research in law and legalities methodologically challenging and still not conventionally ‘legitimate’ in practice. [read post]
6 May 2019, 7:53 am by Rebecca Tushnet
  Puffery is an overlay onto the fact/opinion divide: it allows courts to reject liability for what might look like factual, verifiable claims (such as the cheapest prices in the universe, or even the cheapest prices in West Virginia ) because they are too exaggerated or vague to be believed by reasonable consumers. [read post]
24 Apr 2019, 2:27 pm by admin
Fault of a Third Party Required According to the 1985 Virginia Supreme Court case, Chaves v. [read post]