Search for: "JONES v. BLACK"
Results 41 - 60
of 575
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
8 Mar 2007, 8:56 am
Not content with giving us the landmark Dow Jones v Gutnick case on online defamation (holding that publication takes place at the point of download) and the infamous and much-derided Broadcasting Services Amendment (Online Services) Act (regulating Australian-hosted and foreign-provided Internet content under a semi-broadcast framework applying to ISPs etc), I see that the good government of Australia is back to give us more! [read post]
27 Jun 2015, 8:13 pm
" (Bob Jones, 461 U.S. 574, at 586; emphasis added.) [read post]
6 Oct 2019, 3:37 am
” Gilmore & Black §6–20, at 327.But the Jones Act was overtaken in the 1950s by the second fundamental change in personal injury maritime claims—and it was this Court, not Congress, that played the leading role. [read post]
22 Jan 2007, 9:50 am
Black in the syllabus. [read post]
2 Aug 2012, 6:57 am
This case generated extensive news coverage in Connecticut, including a good summary of the oral argument in January 2012.The case is Jones v. [read post]
3 Sep 2009, 9:07 pm
Today was the deadline for all amici supporting Harris Associates to file their briefs in the Supreme Court case of Jones v. [read post]
26 Oct 2007, 1:04 am
DISTRICT COURTSOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORKEmployment
Black Former Probationary Teacher Loses Claims Of Racial Discrimination Filed Against City Schools
Kenney v. [read post]
6 Jun 2013, 1:21 pm
One of the students, a black man in the back of the room, asked Judge Jones to clarify whether she meant that these groups are actually predisposed towards violent crime. [read post]
24 Jan 2019, 1:31 am
Today, 24 January 2019, five Supreme Court judges (Lord Reed, Lord Kerr, Lady Black, Lord Briggs and Lord Kitchin) will hear Stocker v Stocker UKSC 2018/0045, an appeal against the 12 February 2018 Court of Appeal decision of Lady Justice Sharp, with whom Lord Justice McFarlane and Sir John Laws concurred ([2018] EWCA Civ 170). [read post]
5 Feb 2017, 12:57 pm
See Hoven v. [read post]
7 Aug 2016, 2:35 pm
Jones v Luton Borough Council [2016] EWHC 2036 (Admin) This was a judicial review of a decision by Luton Council Housing Appeals and Review Panel not to offer Mr Jones a tenancy of the property of which Mr J’s late father was the tenant, but instead offer a one bed property. [read post]
29 Jul 2015, 7:32 am
Kraemer, which held that racially restrictive covenants could not be enforced by courts; Jones v. [read post]
31 Jul 2015, 11:00 am
Kraemer, which held that racially restrictive covenants could not be enforced by courts; Jones v. [read post]
22 Jul 2020, 7:38 am
Jones v. [read post]
7 Jul 2017, 2:31 pm
* Indiana Jones v. [read post]
14 Apr 2018, 1:01 am
Supreme Court, he heard the case Brown v. [read post]
11 Mar 2013, 5:31 am
Jones, 132 S.Ct.945 (2012). [read post]
7 Apr 2016, 7:49 pm
See United States v. [read post]
22 Jun 2011, 9:23 am
Judgment Released: April 19, 2011 Link to Judgment The court, citing Black’s Law Dictionary, 7th edition, defined a document as relevant “if it has probative value; if it is logically connected to and tending to prove or disprove a matter in issue. [read post]
