Search for: "JONES v. GOVERNMENT OF THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA" Results 1 - 20 of 221
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
23 Jan 2012, 7:15 am by Jaclyn Belczyk
The federal government sought Supreme Court review after the US Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit ruled [JURIST reports] in 2010 that prolonged... [read post]
23 Jan 2012, 11:32 am by Steve Hall
The United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit overturned his conviction, saying the sheer amount of information that had been collected violated the Fourth Amendment, which bars unreasonable searches. [read post]
9 Aug 2010, 12:26 pm by zshapiro
The District of Columbia Circuit Court of Appeals reversed Antoine Jones’ conviction for distribution of cocaine and cocaine base due to Global Positioning System (GPS) tracking of Jones’ vehicle without a search warrant. [read post]
2 Feb 2017, 5:55 pm by Nate Cardozo
Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit Thursday, when EFF, human rights lawyer Scott Gilmore, and the law firms of Jones Day and Robins Kaplan went to court in Kidane v. [read post]
31 Jan 2017, 8:15 am by Rebecca Jeschke
Kidane first brought suit against Ethiopia in 2014, but the federal court held that no foreign government could be held accountable for wiretapping an American citizen in his own home, so Kidane appealed to the U.S Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit. [read post]
5 Nov 2011, 7:15 am by brian
  Representing a District of Columbia man, Antoine Jones, whose conviction for drug trafficking was overturned by a lower court, will be Stephen C. [read post]
4 Nov 2011, 9:03 pm by Lyle Denniston
  Representing a District of Columbia man, Antoine Jones, whose conviction for drug trafficking was overturned by a lower court, will be Stephen C. [read post]
29 Nov 2010, 1:49 pm
In a close 5-4 ruling, the US Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia decided not to do a full review of the reversal of a life sentence in the case of a man who was originally convicted of running a drug ring from a DC nightclub. [read post]
23 Jan 2012, 7:37 am
The warrant authorized installation in the District of Columbia and within 10 days, but agents installed the device on the 11th day and in Maryland. [read post]
19 Feb 2021, 4:06 pm by INFORRM
GoogleDecision Date: May 27, 2020 The United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia dismissed Freedom Watch’s appeal against the District Court’s decision which had dismissed its complaint alleging violation of the First Amendment, the Sherman Antitrust Act and the District of Columbia Human Rights Act. [read post]
17 Dec 2013, 10:01 am by Betsy McKenzie
The exciting decision from the Federal District Court for the District of Columbia, Judge Richard Leon presiding, just came out, and it's quite powerful. [read post]
23 Jan 2012, 9:52 am
    In Jones, the Government secured a warrant that permitted it to place a GPS device on Jones' wife's car in the District of Columbia within 10 days of the issuance of the warrant. [read post]
27 Feb 2012, 9:03 am by Richard Renner
  Bowie had lost his First Amendment case in the District of Columbia Circuit. [read post]
30 Mar 2012, 8:55 am by Mike Scarcella
Attorney’s Office for the District of Columbia was not immediately reached for comment this morning. [read post]
14 Jun 2012, 8:57 am by David Smyth
District Court for the District of Columbia, seeking to compel removal of the administrative action to that forum. [read post]
25 Sep 2017, 5:17 am by Andrew King
Note: Following the District of Columbia Court of Appeals decision in Jones v. [read post]
11 Apr 2012, 4:00 pm by josephsongy
It simply failed to comply with the terms of the warrant – that a device be installed in the District of Columbia within 10 days, leading the government to argue that it wasn’t legally required to obtain one. [read post]
23 Jan 2012, 2:41 pm by Jeff Neuburger
Because the Government conceded in the case that it did not comply with the warrant that it had obtained, and argued on appeal only that a warrant was not required to engage in the installation and tracking, Justice Scalia’s opinion lost little time in upholding the ruling of the United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit (captioned below, United States v. [read post]
23 Jan 2012, 5:41 pm by Jeff Neuburger
Because the Government conceded in the case that it did not comply with the warrant that it had obtained, and argued on appeal only that a warrant was not required to engage in the installation and tracking, Justice Scalia’s opinion lost little time in upholding the ruling of the United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit (captioned below, United States v. [read post]