Search for: "JONES v. SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION" Results 1 - 20 of 138
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
9 Nov 2007, 4:49 am
High Court (Administrative Court) Rumbold v The General Medical Council [2007] EWHC 2569 (Admin) (09 November 2007) Hardman, R (on the application of) v The Social Security and Child Support Commissioners & Anor [2007] EWHC 2437 (Admin) (09 November 2007) LT and DT v City & County of Cardiff & Anor [2007] EWHC 2568 (Admin) (09 November 2007) Shore v Sedgwick Financial Services Ltd & Ors [2007] EWHC 2509… [read post]
9 May 2015, 1:29 am by Sme
Colvin (10th Cir., May 1, 2015) (affirming denial of social security, disability benefits, and disabled widows benefits based on weight given to the treating physician's testimony)Public EmployeesHollenbach v. [read post]
22 Apr 2021, 7:28 am by Jonathan H. Adler
Saul, that the lower court improperly imposed an issue-exhaustion requirement on Social Security benefit claimants who had sought to press Appointments Clause challenges against Social Security Administration Administrative Law Judges in the wake of Lucia v. [read post]
9 Jul 2018, 3:28 pm by Stewart Baker
Hayden is a former head of the CIA and NSA, and a harsh critic of the Trump Administration. [read post]
Most commentary on Kavanaugh’s nomination has focused on what this shift may entail for a variety of domestic policies and social issues that are likely to come before the court, such as abortion and the scope of the administrative state. [read post]
26 Jul 2018, 11:55 am by Christopher Walker
A recent Mother Jones headline aptly summarizes one potential line of attack: “How Brett Kavanaugh Could Cripple the Next Democratic President. [read post]
6 Jan 2014, 12:46 am by CAJ
Obrey v Secretary of State for Work and Pensions [2013] EWCA Civ 1584 concerns an appeal against an Upper Tribunal (Administrative Appeals Chamber) decision which set aside the findings of the First-tier Tribunal (Social Security and Child Support) that Reg. 7(17), Housing Benefit Regulations 2006, breached Art. 14 ECHR (although not expressly set out in the Judgment, presumably in conjunction with A1P1). [read post]
6 Jan 2014, 12:46 am by CAJ
Obrey v Secretary of State for Work and Pensions [2013] EWCA Civ 1584 concerns an appeal against an Upper Tribunal (Administrative Appeals Chamber) decision which set aside the findings of the First-tier Tribunal (Social Security and Child Support) that Reg. 7(17), Housing Benefit Regulations 2006, breached Art. 14 ECHR (although not expressly set out in the Judgment, presumably in conjunction with A1P1). [read post]
9 Nov 2014, 6:46 pm
That broadening has made it possible to offer the course not just to first year law students, but also to graduate students in the social sciences and in international affairs, as a grounding in the legal systems that are important in their respective fields. [read post]
29 Oct 2011, 2:33 pm
AstrueCourt: U.S. 9th Circuit Court of Appeals Docket: 09-56515 October 25, 2011 Judge: Silverman Areas of Law: Government & Administrative Law, Public Benefits Plaintiff appealed the district court's decision affirming the Social Security Administration's (SSA) denial of her applications for disability insurance benefits and supplemental security income. [read post]
4 Sep 2011, 7:15 am
AstrueCourt: U.S. 8th Circuit Court of Appeals Docket: 10-3134 : August 30, 2011 Judge: Shepherd Areas of Law: Civil Rights, Constitutional Law, Government & Administrative Law, Public Benefits Appellee applied for supplemental security income under Title XVI of the Social Security Act, 42 U.S.C. 1382. [read post]
4 Sep 2011, 7:15 am
AstrueCourt: U.S. 8th Circuit Court of Appeals Docket: 10-3134 : August 30, 2011 Judge: Shepherd Areas of Law: Civil Rights, Constitutional Law, Government & Administrative Law, Public Benefits Appellee applied for supplemental security income under Title XVI of the Social Security Act, 42 U.S.C. 1382. [read post]
12 Nov 2011, 2:22 am
Decisions of interest involving Government and Administrative LawSource: Justia November 11, 2011 Farris v. [read post]
26 Nov 2011, 2:08 am
She named the State of Kansas, the state Department of Social and Rehabilitation Services, social workers and their supervisors and the state court judge who ruled on the "Child in Need of Care" (CINC) matter relating to all three children and the adoption proceeding of her grandson "C.W. [read post]
9 Jul 2022, 6:01 am by Benjamin Pollard
Peter Margulies explained the Supreme Court’s decision in Biden v. [read post]
1 Dec 2011, 6:25 am by Kiran Bhat
In Federal Aviation Administration v. [read post]