Search for: "JONES v. SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION"
Results 41 - 60
of 124
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
8 Oct 2020, 6:30 am
(579) Yet, as Fulton v. [read post]
21 Jun 2020, 4:10 pm
IPSO IPSO has published a number of rulings and resolutions statements since our last Round Up: 06584-20 Fair Play for Women v The Times, 1 Accuracy (2019), Resolved- IPSO mediation 02638-20 A woman v Mail Online, 3 Harassment (2019), 2 Privacy (2019), 1 Accuracy (2019), 4 Intrusion into grief or shock (2019), 6 Children (2019), 12 Discrimination (2019), 14 Confidential sources (2019), Resolved0 IPSO mediation 01321-20 A Man v Sunday Life, 11 Victims of sexual assault… [read post]
17 May 2020, 4:39 pm
The lawyer for Ben Roberts-Smith says his client is desperate to clear his name in an open court in his long awaited defamation trial against three former Fairfax newspapers continues to be hampered by national security concerns raised by the attorney general. [read post]
29 Mar 2020, 4:49 pm
Ireland An Irish horseracing regulatory board’s security officer was awarded €300,000 in damages in a defamation case against the Irish racehorse trainers association. [read post]
15 Mar 2020, 5:36 pm
Data Security Management in Digital Business, Oana Buzianu, Independent. [read post]
8 Mar 2020, 7:33 pm
To court provided this explanation on this recent motion, in Karasik v. [read post]
9 Feb 2020, 4:05 pm
The Irish Times had a piece “Turf Club’s security head claims defamation over yard inspection letter”. [read post]
26 Jan 2020, 4:24 pm
Microsoft was praised for acting swiftly to lock down the exposed servers and secured all data within days. [read post]
12 Dec 2019, 8:58 am
The plaintiff had security cameras in place that captured the officers’ entry into the home. [read post]
11 Oct 2019, 3:00 am
The 2010 SpeechNow v. [read post]
31 May 2019, 6:00 am
Though the law has survived innumerable attempts at repeal and administrative sabotage, its intransigent foes, prominently including the Trump administration, are still out to kill it in the courts, and the residual skepticism seeded by the misbegotten-birth narrative could help legitimate their aspiration that, this third, legally absurd, attempt might just succeed. [read post]
1 May 2019, 2:43 pm
Wash. 2018) (determining that a hand inspection of all items of a visitor to the Spokane Social Security Administration offices is reasonable and no more intrusive than necessary to further the Government’s legitimate goal in preventing destruction and injury on federal property). [read post]
31 Mar 2019, 11:50 pm
The Social Media Law Bulletin has a piece on “Social media influencer advertising in Canada”. [read post]
10 Mar 2019, 5:08 pm
Internet and Social Media The Government has finally published its response [pdf] to the 2017 “call for evidence” on the impact of social media on the administration of justice. [read post]
1 Feb 2019, 10:51 am
Cooperatives: the first social enterprise. [read post]
25 Jan 2019, 2:13 pm
Berryhill (March 18): Whether, if the Social Security Administration’s Appeals Council determines that an appeal from an administrative decision by an individual seeking disability benefits is filed too late, that ruling is a “final decision” that courts can review Cochise Consultancy v. [read post]
31 Oct 2018, 11:21 am
Berryhill, 17-1606, presents a question only a lawyer could love: whether a decision by the Social Security Administration’s “Appeals Council” — the body that hears disability benefits claimants’ appeals from administrative law judge decisions — that the claimant’s appeal was untimely is a “final decision” subject to judicial review. [read post]
27 Aug 2018, 3:41 pm
See Mock v. [read post]
22 Aug 2018, 10:45 am
For example, in Jones v. [read post]
26 Jul 2018, 11:55 am
A recent Mother Jones headline aptly summarizes one potential line of attack: “How Brett Kavanaugh Could Cripple the Next Democratic President. [read post]
