Search for: "JUDGE v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA" Results 261 - 280 of 3,546
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
16 Mar 2022, 7:39 pm
Donoghue, présidente de la Cour.Links to the Opinion and the declarations and Separate opinions of some of the judges:  Order of 16 March 2022 Declaration of Vice-President Gevorgian Declaration of Judge Bennouna Declaration of Judge Xue Separate opinion of Judge Robinson Declaration of Judge Nolte Declaration of Judge ad hoc Daudet Summary 2022/2  the Order of 16 March 2022 The text of the decision follows along with… [read post]
2 Feb 2017, 5:55 pm by Nate Cardozo
One judge asked what would happen if Ethiopia mailed a letter bomb into the United States to assassinate an opponent, or hacked an American's self-driving car, causing it to crash. [read post]
9 Jan 2008, 2:25 am
In granting partial summary judgment in favor of the RIAA, the judge observed that internet companies "may have a misconception that, because their technology is somewhat novel, they are somehow immune from the ordinary applications of laws of the United States, including copyright law," but that "[t]hey need to understand that the law's domain knows no such limits. [read post]
9 Jun 2022, 9:05 pm by Dan Flynn
But in the criminal case of United States of America v. [read post]
30 May 2015, 10:01 pm by Dan Flynn
While it’s been difficult to wait for the past eight months, we are now confident that the trial of the United States of America v. [read post]
28 Aug 2017, 2:59 pm by Lawrence B. Ebert
[And see footnote 15]In dissent, Judge Newman began:An important threshold issue before the court iswhether the United States and its agency the UnitedStates Postal Service are within the definition of “person”in § 18(a)(1)(B) of the America Invents Act, and thusentitled to proceed under that Act. [read post]
15 Jun 2015, 5:17 pm
 Moderator Julia Elvidge (President, Chipworks) opened this session with a review of the America Invents Act (AIA)'s inter partes reviews, asking whether the Patent Trial and Appeal Board (PTAB) was truly a patent-killing board, as former judge Randall Rader had suggested, or whether its initially harsh treatment of patents had mellowed somewhat. [read post]
24 Apr 2016, 10:11 am by Simon Lester
(Metalclad Corporation v United Mexican States, Submission of the Government of the United States (ICSID Case No. [read post]