Search for: "JUDGE v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA"
Results 101 - 120
of 3,551
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
2 Oct 2023, 11:29 am
Supreme Court, but then the justices agreed in March to hear an admiralty law case over choice-of-law provisions in which he represents a yacht owner challenging the denial of an insurance claim.Today's DJ has:Floyd Siegal's A Ruthless Court, about the friendship between RBG and Nino Scalia.PJ Gilbert has Times, They Changed, about judges who write books (e.g., Beds, Eileen Moore, Anthony Mohr, Timothy Fall, etc.) and how judges reveal more about themselves than ever… [read post]
1 Oct 2023, 9:05 pm
ENDNOTES [1] United States of America v. [read post]
28 Sep 2023, 6:30 am
One could not confidently say the same of the United States. [read post]
27 Sep 2023, 10:05 am
There Chief Justice John Roberts cited then-Judge Brett Kavanaugh’s dissent from denial of rehearing en banc in United States Telecom Assn. v. [read post]
26 Sep 2023, 5:55 am
(The Doe v. [read post]
13 Sep 2023, 5:38 am
The 1912 joint resolution (37 Stat. 646) read as follows: Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United States of America in Congress assembled (two-thirds of each House concurring therein), That in lieu of the first paragraph of section three of Article I of the Constitution of the United States, and in lieu of so much of paragraph two of the same section as relates to the filling of vacancies, the following be proposed as an… [read post]
5 Sep 2023, 9:05 pm
Jarkesy,[2] a case which raises an important challenge to the power of administrative law judges (ALJs). [read post]
4 Sep 2023, 5:44 am
(Please note that these figures do not include state court securities class action lawsuit filings.) [read post]
2 Sep 2023, 11:21 pm
The most recent example is the Grand Chamber case of S, V and A v Denmark [GC], nos. 35553/12 and 2 others, 22 October 2018. [read post]
25 Aug 2023, 5:30 am
In its landmark 1964 decision, the United States Supreme Court held that a public official must prove “actual malice” or reckless disregard of the truth to win a libel lawsuit, providing critical protections for free speech and freedom of the press. [read post]
21 Aug 2023, 6:05 am
Both Germany and the United States have advocated the “hybrid” route, with U.S. [read post]
17 Aug 2023, 9:05 pm
In United States v. [read post]
14 Aug 2023, 9:01 pm
Wade (1973) and Planned Parenthood v. [read post]
Of Insurrections, Presidents, and the Utter Failure of Constitutional Law to Address the Real Issues
14 Aug 2023, 4:00 am
Dedicated to Retired Judge Dick Posner Two of America's most prominent conservative constitutional law professors, both self-described originalists, Will Baude and Michael Paulsen, have penned a 126-page opus explaining why Section 3 of the Fourteenth Amendment disqualifies on its own terms with no enabling legislation Donald Trump and likely many others from holding office under the United States or any state. [read post]
2 Aug 2023, 9:01 pm
But that traditional formulation is over-determinative; after all, Article II provides that “[t]he executive Power shall be vested in a President of the United States of America,” and yet no one doubts that the President may transfer executive authority to his underlings in the Executive Branch. [read post]
1 Aug 2023, 8:56 am
United States v. [read post]
21 Jul 2023, 6:00 am
They want access to our markets without being held responsible for the damage they are causing to consumers here in the United States. [read post]
20 Jul 2023, 8:54 am
Alliance Resources Corp., BMW of North America, Inc. v. [read post]
13 Jul 2023, 12:06 pm
They assessed what the opinion means for existing constitutional and civil rights law, as well as for affirmative action policies and diversity in America more broadly. [read post]
13 Jul 2023, 3:43 am
The second is that Judge Terry Doughty’s injunction in Missouri v. [read post]
