Search for: "JUDICIAL WATCH, INC"
Results 21 - 40
of 880
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
11 Nov 2009, 8:00 am
Pro-Football, Inc. [read post]
26 Aug 2021, 9:02 am
Judicial Watch, Inc., --- F.4th ----, 2021 WL 3233953, No. 19-7105 (D.C. [read post]
12 Jun 2009, 10:49 am
Commissioner of Revenue of Massachusetts ; Geoffrey, Inc., v. [read post]
8 Dec 2020, 12:01 pm
(relisted after the Dec. 4 conference) Goldman Sachs Group, Inc. v. [read post]
5 Mar 2022, 12:59 am
You can watch the liver or archived video here. [read post]
27 Apr 2011, 8:25 pm
This edition of “Petitions to watch” features cases up for consideration at the Justices’ April 29 conference. [read post]
8 Mar 2024, 12:19 pm
In an electronic mail to Judicial Watch a partner in the law firm, Michael Boehm, writes that his client, which he identifies as “Canadian Royalties Inc. [read post]
3 Aug 2020, 4:32 pm
(Supreme Court of Ohio in LRC Realty, Inc. v. [read post]
25 Jun 2013, 8:05 pm
Limelight Networks, Inc., 12-960. [read post]
14 Mar 2014, 8:00 am
The last new arrival to Relist Watch this week is Jennings v. [read post]
26 Jun 2019, 3:24 pm
Greetings and welcome to the last Relist Watch of the year. [read post]
14 Jun 2015, 12:02 am
IRS, Response to Notice (No. 1:13-cv-1559-EGS, June 12, 2015): In accordance with the Court's June 4, 2015, Order, the Internal Revenue Service ("Service") responds to Judicial Watch, Inc.'s Notice dated June 2, 2015: 15. [read post]
21 Jan 2023, 7:39 am
Judicial Watch, Inc. v. [read post]
20 Mar 2019, 8:43 am
Nike, Inc., 18-728. [read post]
20 Jun 2019, 5:45 am
Bennett Regulator Guards Inc., 18-999 Issues: (1) Whether the U.S. [read post]
23 May 2019, 7:12 am
But here at Relist Watch, we’re just giving the stuff away. [read post]
27 Mar 2019, 11:19 am
Harris Funeral Homes Inc v. [read post]
20 Apr 2016, 10:35 am
Varsity Brands, Inc. 15-866Issue: (1) What is the appropriate test to determine when a feature of a useful article is protectable under section 101 of the Copyright Act; and (2) whether, in determining a copyright registration’s validity, a court should give any judicial deference in addition to the statutory deference articulated in 17 U.S.C. [read post]
7 Jan 2015, 10:52 am
Google Inc. v. [read post]
31 Oct 2018, 11:21 am
We at Relist Watch tend to prefer the obscure to the obvious – we like the shadow docket shadowy. [read post]