Search for: "JUDICIAL WATCH, INC" Results 21 - 40 of 880
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
26 Aug 2021, 9:02 am by Rebecca Tushnet
Judicial Watch, Inc., --- F.4th ----, 2021 WL 3233953, No. 19-7105 (D.C. [read post]
12 Jun 2009, 10:49 am
Commissioner of Revenue of Massachusetts ; Geoffrey, Inc., v. [read post]
8 Dec 2020, 12:01 pm by John Elwood
(relisted after the Dec. 4 conference) Goldman Sachs Group, Inc. v. [read post]
27 Apr 2011, 8:25 pm by Christa Culver
This edition of “Petitions to watch” features cases up for consideration at the Justices’ April 29 conference. [read post]
8 Mar 2024, 12:19 pm by Irene
In an electronic mail to Judicial Watch a partner in the law firm, Michael Boehm, writes that his client, which he identifies as “Canadian Royalties Inc. [read post]
25 Jun 2013, 8:05 pm by John Elwood
Limelight Networks, Inc., 12-960. [read post]
14 Mar 2014, 8:00 am by John Elwood
  The last new arrival to Relist Watch this week is Jennings v. [read post]
26 Jun 2019, 3:24 pm by John Elwood
Greetings and welcome to the last Relist Watch of the year. [read post]
14 Jun 2015, 12:02 am by Paul Caron
IRS, Response to Notice (No. 1:13-cv-1559-EGS, June 12, 2015): In accordance with the Court's June 4, 2015, Order, the Internal Revenue Service ("Service") responds to Judicial Watch, Inc.'s Notice dated June 2, 2015: 15. [read post]
20 Mar 2019, 8:43 am by John Elwood
Nike, Inc., 18-728. [read post]
20 Jun 2019, 5:45 am by John Elwood
Bennett Regulator Guards Inc., 18-999 Issues: (1) Whether the U.S. [read post]
23 May 2019, 7:12 am by John Elwood
But here at Relist Watch, we’re just giving the stuff away. [read post]
27 Mar 2019, 11:19 am by John Elwood
Harris Funeral Homes Inc v. [read post]
20 Apr 2016, 10:35 am by John Elwood
Varsity Brands, Inc. 15-866Issue: (1) What is the appropriate test to determine when a feature of a useful article is protectable under section 101 of the Copyright Act; and (2) whether, in determining a copyright registration’s validity, a court should give any judicial deference in addition to the statutory deference articulated in 17 U.S.C. [read post]
31 Oct 2018, 11:21 am by John Elwood
We at Relist Watch tend to prefer the obscure to the obvious – we like the shadow docket shadowy. [read post]