Search for: "JUSTICE v. HARRISON" Results 1 - 20 of 387
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
26 Dec 2024, 9:24 pm by Josh Blackman
" Most people stopped caring about this issue once Trump v. [read post]
3 Dec 2024, 3:44 am by Frank Cranmer
Yesterday, 2 December, there was a short debate in the House of Lords on a Question tabled by Baroness Thornton (Lab) and asked on the day by Lord Dubs (Lab), asking His Majesty’s Government whether they conducted an equality impact assessment following the judgment in R (Harrison & Ors) v Secretary of State for Justice [2020] concerning humanist marriages. [read post]
7 Nov 2024, 12:52 pm by Guest Author
That position has gained traction recently in some quarters, and it has been endorsed by one justice of the Supreme Court. [read post]
17 Oct 2024, 3:54 am by Frank Cranmer
Bs Thornton pointed out that in 2020, the High Court had ruled (in R (Harrison & Ors) v Secretary of State for Justice [2020] EWHC 2096 (Admin) at [111]) that the failure to provide humanist marriages in England and Wales was discriminatory and the Government could not simply “sit on its hands” and do nothing – to which Lord Ponsonby responded, not unreasonably, that “the previous Government chose not to respond to the Law Commission report, and… [read post]
7 Oct 2024, 3:00 am by jonathanturley
Democratic President Martin Van Buren was struggling for reelection against Whig William Henry Harrison, and his Justice Department waited until just before voters went to the polls to allege that Whig Party officials had paid Pennsylvanians to travel to New York to vote for Whig candidates two years earlier. [read post]
22 Jul 2024, 5:32 am by Josh Blackman
Harrison, Public Rights, Private Privileges, and Article III, 54 Ga. [read post]
16 Jul 2024, 5:09 pm by Amy Howe
” The state urged the justices to stay out of the dispute, characterizing Gutierrez’s argument as resting on an “overwrought interpretation” of the “Fifth Circuit’s straightforward application of this Court’s holding in Reed v. [read post]
8 Jul 2024, 2:00 am by Patricia McKee
Student reporters Harrison Bench, Patricia McKee, and Emily Petermann prepared this summary of the roundtable discussion. [read post]
7 Jul 2024, 5:13 am by Frank Cranmer
The High Court agreed in R (Harrison) v Secretary of State for Justice [2020] EWHC 2096 (Admin) that the current lack of provision for legal humanist weddings in England and Wales was in breach of Article 9 ECHR. [read post]
14 Jun 2024, 12:30 pm by John Ross
Please enjoy the latest edition of Short Circuit, a weekly feature written by a bunch of people at the Institute for Justice. [read post]
3 Jun 2024, 1:48 am by INFORRM
On Friday 31 May 2024, Belfast’s High Court found that sections 12 – 16 of the Justice (Sexual Offences and Trafficking Victims) Act (Northern Ireland) 2022 were incompatible with press freedom and Article 10 ECHR rights. [read post]
28 May 2024, 11:38 am by INFORRM
On the same day, judgment was handed down in Chancery Division by Mr Justice Mellor in conclusion of Crypto Open Patent Alliance v Craig Steven Wright [2024] EWHC 1198 (Ch). [read post]
19 May 2024, 10:13 pm by INFORRM
On Tuesday 14 May 2024 there was an application for security for costs in the case of Sikhs for Justice and another v Ranger KB-2022-004490. [read post]
13 May 2024, 12:57 am by INFORRM
On Tuesday 14 May 2024 there will be an application for security for costs in the case of Sikhs for Justice and another v Ranger KB-2022-004490 and a statement in open court in the case of Davies -v- BBC–KB-2024-000828. [read post]
29 Apr 2024, 2:40 am by INFORRM
Reserved Judgments Harrison v Cameron, heard 26 March 2024 (Steyn J) BW Legal Services Limited v Trustpilot,  heard 7 March 2024 (HHJ Lewis) Unity Plus Healthcare Limited v Clay and others,  heard 1 March 2024 (HHJ Lewis) Vince v Associated Newspapers, heard 19 February 2024 (HHJ Lewis) Pacini v Dow Jones, heard 13 December 2023 (HHJ Parkes KC) Mueen-Uddin v Secretary of State for the Home Department, heard… [read post]
22 Apr 2024, 1:06 am by INFORRM
Justice Lee stated that there were issues with the reliability of both Lehrmann and Higgins, but found that, on the balance of probabilities, Ms Higgins’s allegations that Mr Lehrmann raped her were true. [read post]
15 Apr 2024, 8:52 am by Guest Author
(John Harrison’s recent JREG post considers another angle in Corner Post: the universal remedy of vacatur.) [read post]
15 Apr 2024, 2:31 am by INFORRM
A letter co-ordinated by the Anti-SLAPP Coalition to Justice Secretary Alex Chalk seeks an amendment to the anti-SLAPP bill making its way through Parliament. [read post]