Search for: "JUSTICE v. HARRISON"
Results 181 - 200
of 383
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
29 Mar 2025, 11:32 pm
Humanist weddings On Monday, the Chair of the Joint Committee on Human Rights, Lord Alton, wrote formally to Lord Ponsonby, Parliamentary Under-Secretary of State at the MoJ, reminding him of the judgment of Eady J in R (Harrison & Ors) v Secretary of State for Justice [2020] EWHC 2096 (Admin), and asking what the Government was doing about legalising humanist weddings in England and Wales – they are legal in Scotland. [read post]
6 May 2016, 2:18 pm
Supreme Court decided in Hurst v. [read post]
6 Aug 2015, 5:09 am
Pham and the Open Society Justice Initiative argued that if the Supreme Court was in any doubt on the application of EU law, it should refer the ambiguity to the Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU). [read post]
29 Oct 2009, 1:05 pm
Secretary of State for Defence [2008] EWHC 3098 (Admin), paras 89 et seq, and followed obiter in R (Al-Saadoon) v. [read post]
25 Aug 2023, 9:17 am
Pye v. [read post]
7 Apr 2024, 4:37 pm
On 26 March 2024, there was a trial in the data protection case of Harrison v Cameron QB-2022-002468 before Steyn J. [read post]
26 Dec 2011, 3:03 am
Toronto : Emond Montgomery, 2009 HV 9960 C2 W64 2009 Women and the criminal justice system : a Canadian perspective [edited by] Jane Barker. [read post]
9 May 2010, 9:14 pm
” Ex parte Harrison, 2010 Ala. [read post]
28 Jun 2022, 7:15 am
The case, Ruan v. [read post]
2 Jan 2012, 7:08 am
In last week’s case (Wilkinson v. [read post]
29 Mar 2015, 4:02 pm
On the same day there was a statement in open court in the case of Harrison-Allan v Newsquest SIOC. [read post]
7 Oct 2011, 7:53 pm
See Martin v. [read post]
7 Oct 2011, 7:53 pm
See Martin v. [read post]
9 Dec 2020, 9:01 pm
Justice Thomas recently endorsed Harrison’s view, writing that “[r]emedies ‘operate with respect to specific parties,’ not ‘on legal rules in the abstract. [read post]
31 May 2018, 11:13 am
For example, the majority and separate opinions in Jesner v. [read post]
28 Nov 2017, 2:15 am
But he wrote a strong dissent in the Texas v. [read post]
25 Jun 2018, 11:38 am
The justices vacated Rucho v. [read post]
12 Apr 2022, 10:17 am
Int’l v. www.playboyrabbitars.app, 2021 U.S. [read post]
10 Sep 2010, 8:07 am
Cricket Lighters, 841 A.2d 1000 (Pa. 2003), three justices of the Pennsylvania Supreme Court opined that a quarter century had proven wanting the “strict liability” of the Azzarello sort, and that Pennsylvania law should move to the negligence-based standard of §2. 841 A.2d at 1015-16. [read post]
4 Aug 2012, 9:32 am
Judge Timothy Alexander's ruling in Haugen v. [read post]
