Search for: "JUSTICE v. HARRISON"
Results 241 - 260
of 417
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
10 Feb 2022, 6:30 am
In Collins v. [read post]
23 Aug 2010, 12:19 am
Vetere then attempted to have the “certificate of vacancy” prepared by the town clerk on February 19 annulled and sought a declaratory judgment by a State Supreme Court justice that he was now entitled to a full four-year term of office as a result his reelection the previous November.Supreme Court Justice Nicholas Colabella ruled that there was no statutory authority for issuing such a judgment. [read post]
14 Feb 2009, 6:09 pm
Bob Wagner, R-Harrison. [read post]
8 Nov 2010, 9:19 am
The most recent lawyer-president to do so was Richard Nixon when he argued the case of Time v. [read post]
9 Oct 2013, 11:14 am
Co. v. [read post]
16 Jun 2019, 4:58 am
Harrison, Peter F. [read post]
19 Sep 2008, 12:58 pm
Likewise, the right of parents to control the education and upbringing of their children is fundamental under Pierce v Society of Sisters and Meyer v Nebraska, yet states have enormous latitude in requiring parents to send their kids to school, vaccinate their kids, and so forth. [read post]
9 Feb 2013, 5:11 am
Ellis has posted "Polley v. [read post]
2 May 2010, 1:12 pm
” Ex parte Harrison, 2010 Ala. [read post]
17 Nov 2014, 5:26 pm
Raich v. [read post]
6 Jan 2012, 4:00 am
Harrison on the recent decision in UMG v. [read post]
16 Nov 2022, 6:50 am
Massachusetts, or as Justice Breyer said in his opinion for the Court in California v. [read post]
20 May 2019, 9:11 am
In Vine v. [read post]
19 Oct 2011, 7:10 am
Although there is no hard and fast rule as to apportionment in cases involving a successful seatbelt defence, the plaintiff is often held to be 10% to 25% contributorily negligent: Harrison v. [read post]
3 Feb 2017, 1:45 pm
In McGillis v. [read post]
22 Jul 2013, 3:51 am
One of the more unusual references to be made to the Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU) in recent times is Case C‑414/11, Daiichi Sankyo Co. [read post]
19 Jun 2018, 12:47 pm
The case, Apple v. [read post]
10 Nov 2016, 12:00 pm
Congress set up a special electoral 15-member commission of congressmen and Supreme Court justices. [read post]
27 Oct 2020, 5:01 am
Chief Justice Marshall considered the matter directly in Loughborough v. [read post]
27 Oct 2020, 5:01 am
Chief Justice Marshall considered the matter directly in Loughborough v. [read post]
