Search for: "JUSTICE v. HARRISON" Results 21 - 40 of 380
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
15 Apr 2024, 2:31 am by INFORRM
A letter co-ordinated by the Anti-SLAPP Coalition to Justice Secretary Alex Chalk seeks an amendment to the anti-SLAPP bill making its way through Parliament. [read post]
7 Apr 2024, 4:37 pm by INFORRM
On 26 March 2024, there was a trial in the data protection case of Harrison v Cameron QB-2022-002468 before Steyn J. [read post]
25 Mar 2024, 10:47 am by Jim Lindgren
" Perhaps the most notable expression of such ideas came from Chief Justice John Mar [read post]
25 Mar 2024, 2:13 am by INFORRM
On 22 March 2024, there was a remedies hearing before Collins Rice J in Blake v Fox QB-2021-001248. [read post]
18 Mar 2024, 3:52 am by INFORRM
On 13 March 2024 there was a Pre-Trial Review in the case of Harrison v Cameron QB-2022-002468. [read post]
9 Feb 2024, 5:55 am by Tess Bridgeman
Hathaway (@oonahathaway), Yuval Shany (@yuvalshany1), Paras Shah (@pshah518) and Clara Apt (@claraapt25) (January 26, 2024) Top Experts’ Views of Int’l Court of Justice Ruling on Israel Gaza Operations (South Africa v Israel, Genocide Convention Case) By Just Security (January 26, 2024) Unpacking the Int’l Court of Justice Judgment in South Africa v Israel (Genocide Case) By Ryan Goodman (@rgoodlaw) and Siven Watt (@SivenWatt) (January 26, 2024)… [read post]
4 Feb 2024, 11:30 am by Will Baude
" Franck commended the justices for exercising great integrity in putting politics and popularity aside when they overruled Roe v. [read post]
4 Jan 2024, 12:50 pm by Josh Blackman
We cite the corpus linguistics amicus brief written by James Heilpern in Lucia v. [read post]
8 Dec 2023, 8:50 am by Will Baude
(I am borrowing this second example from Chief Justice Roberts at the oral argument in SEC v. [read post]
1 Dec 2023, 9:30 pm by ernst
New online from in the American Journal of Legal History: Justice Kennedy’s Jurisprudence of Dignity: From Sovereign Immunity to Gay Rights, by Eric J Scarffe. [read post]
4 May 2023, 9:05 pm by renholding
It is a common refrain, mostly on the political right, that considering environmental, social, and governance (“ESG”) factors when investing is probably illegal.[1] The basis for this argument derives from the fiduciary duty of loyalty and its corollary, the “sole interest” or “exclusive benefit” rule, enshrined in both federal and state law, which prohibits fiduciaries from investing for any purpose other than the financial well-being of the beneficiary. [read post]