Search for: "JUSTICE v. HARRISON" Results 21 - 40 of 416
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
4 May 2023, 9:05 pm by renholding
It is a common refrain, mostly on the political right, that considering environmental, social, and governance (“ESG”) factors when investing is probably illegal.[1] The basis for this argument derives from the fiduciary duty of loyalty and its corollary, the “sole interest” or “exclusive benefit” rule, enshrined in both federal and state law, which prohibits fiduciaries from investing for any purpose other than the financial well-being of the beneficiary. [read post]
26 Apr 2023, 2:39 pm by Josh Blackman
(He has a bad habit of ignoring unhelpful precedent; See U.S. v. [read post]
17 Apr 2023, 5:50 am by INFORRM
 Last week in the courts On 4 April 2023, judgement on costs was handed down by Justice Murray in the case of Parkes v Hall and Earnshaw [2023] EWHC 794 (KB). [read post]
23 Jan 2023, 7:30 am by Guest Blogger
Their images should be treated with the same scorn as those depicting Chief Justice Roger Taney, the author of the execrable decision in Dred Scott v. [read post]
2 Jan 2023, 2:50 pm by Scott Bomboy
Harrison served with distinction as Maryland’s chief justice, but he declined the Senate confirmation due to health issues. [read post]
3 Dec 2022, 12:23 pm by Josh Blackman
Circuit never considered the sorts of arguments raised by Sam Bray and John Harrison. [read post]
28 Nov 2022, 4:45 pm by Samuel Bray
Professor Harrison's work was recently highlighted by Professor Amanda Frost at SCOTUSBlog as one side of a debate critical to United States v. [read post]
23 Nov 2022, 5:55 am by Karuna Nundy
Bangladesh WP 9989 of 2014] by the High Court of Kenya [J Harrison Kinyanjui v. [read post]
16 Nov 2022, 6:50 am by Samuel Bray
Massachusetts, or as Justice Breyer said in his opinion for the Court in California v. [read post]
6 Sep 2022, 6:56 am by Samuel Bray
Equity's concern with the protection of information can be seen as far back as 1818 and the canonical case of Gee v. [read post]