Search for: "JUSTICE v. HARRISON" Results 141 - 160 of 417
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
8 Jan 2019, 3:57 am by Edith Roberts
Harrison, which involves service of process on foreign governments under the Foreign Sovereign Immunities Act, and Biestek v. [read post]
21 Feb 2009, 4:11 am
My weekly podcast roundup of the top family law news and best family law blog posts:The Week in Focus 21st February 2009Stories/posts referred to in this podcast:Court has left these parents in hell - Telegraph Justice Ministry to bar parents from telling their own stories - IndependentBaby P case sparks hike in care applications - Law Society GazetteBaby P: GSCC confirms interim suspensions for social workers - Community CareFamily Law Week blog: Child Protection roundupJudge bans further… [read post]
25 Nov 2015, 2:16 am by Matrix Legal Information Team
The justices agreed that the Scots Guards were in the Federation in the service of His Majesty and in the interests of the UK. [read post]
29 Jan 2014, 5:28 am by Amy Howe
Chris Harrison at the Ogletree Deakins blog. [read post]
17 Oct 2017, 6:44 am by Matthew L.M. Fletcher
Poarch Band of Creek Indians (Tribal Sovereign Immunity)Harrison v. [read post]
26 Dec 2009, 8:27 am by Lawrence Solum
The Download of the Week is McDonald v. [read post]
21 Dec 2009, 1:48 pm by Lawrence Solum
Green (University of Mississippi - School of Law) has posted McDonald v. [read post]
26 Oct 2015, 3:01 am by Administrator
Supreme Court of Canada Chief Justice McLachlin spoke a few hours ago at the Canadian Institute for Administration of Justice (CIAJ) conference in Saskatoon, with her comments focused on barriers to access to justice, especially cultural barriers faced by Aboriginal people. [read post]
16 Apr 2010, 7:24 am by Anna Christensen
”  The Justice’s positions in cases like Planned Parenthood v. [read post]
8 Jul 2020, 4:15 am by Josh Blackman
"Ordinary Severability Principles" Justice Kavanaugh wrote the plurality opinion in Barr v. [read post]
6 Sep 2017, 4:00 am by Alice Woolley
See, e.g., these terrific columns by Patrick Baud and Maxime St-Hillaire, Tom Harrison, and Omar Ha-Redeye, exploring the uncertain legal foundations for the Chief’s order (Baud and St-Hillaire), the general question of how much authority a chief justice has and should have over scheduling and assignments (Harrison), and the Chief’s order as an example of public dialogue and as a potentially troubling precedent (Ha-Redeye). [read post]
1 Dec 2020, 9:45 am by Dennis Crouch
For its analysis, the US attempted to align its argument with the Supreme Court’s approach in Edmond v. [read post]
8 Dec 2023, 8:50 am by Will Baude
(I am borrowing this second example from Chief Justice Roberts at the oral argument in SEC v. [read post]