Search for: "Jack Goldsmith"
Results 741 - 760
of 1,691
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
5 Aug 2017, 4:26 am
Jack Goldsmith reflected on the increasingly fractured nature of the executive branch: key Trump administration officials frequently oppose or contradict President Donald Trump despite his considerable power to fire them. [read post]
1 Aug 2017, 10:23 am
Last week, Jack Goldsmith and I had an exchange over whether the proper response to the President Trump's abuse of law enforcement was for Attorney General Jeff Sessions and Deputy Attorney General Rod Rosenstein to resign in protest or merely to speak up and risk getting fired. [read post]
31 Jul 2017, 12:39 pm
Jack Goldsmith discussed the fractured nature of the current executive branch. [read post]
31 Jul 2017, 7:05 am
As Congress begins to respond more forcefully to Donald Trump’s excesses, a new proposal is taking shape: legislation to limit the president’s capacity to fire the special counsel. [read post]
31 Jul 2017, 5:46 am
Amusingly apt comments from legal scholar Jack Goldsmith (Harvard): The fractured executive branch is partly a result of terrible executive organization but mainly the product of an incompetent, mendacious president interacting with appointed or inherited executive branch officials who possess... [read post]
29 Jul 2017, 6:27 am
Jack Goldsmith discussed how those serving the American people should handle a President so openly hostile to his senior intelligence and law enforcement officials. [read post]
28 Jul 2017, 9:06 am
In a three-tweet policy announcement Wednesday morning, President Trump promised to institute a ban on transgender service-members. [read post]
27 Jul 2017, 9:44 am
Ben Wittes outlined a defense of his view offered last Thursday that Sessions and Deputy Attorney General Rod Rosenstein should jointly resign, and assessed the merits of the opposing view put forth by Jack Goldsmith in the day following. [read post]
26 Jul 2017, 1:48 pm
ICYMI: Yesterday, on Lawfare Jack Goldsmith discussed how law enforcement officials should handle a “Kamikaze” president. [read post]
26 Jul 2017, 5:00 am
” Responding over the next two days, Jack Goldsmith argued that while “one or both men would be justified in resigning” given the president’s public vote of no confidence, “the resignation of the top two officials in DOJ would throw DOJ into more of a crisis than it already is in. [read post]
25 Jul 2017, 1:23 pm
The Lawfare Editors reposted Jack Goldsmith’s 2015 interview with Times executive editor Dean Baquet on publication decisions about intelligence secrets. [read post]
25 Jul 2017, 6:00 am
Jack Goldsmith and Marty Lederman take the view that they “almost certainly” are. [read post]
24 Jul 2017, 2:11 pm
ICYMI: This Weekend, on Lawfare Matthew Kahn posted the Lawfare Podcast, in which Jack Goldsmith interviews Graham Allison about his new book, Destined for War: Can America and China Escape Thucydides's Trap? [read post]
24 Jul 2017, 8:55 am
The Times noted that it was not the first time it had published the officer's name, and for further explanation of its original decision, it referenced a 2015 interview on Lawfare by Jack Goldsmith of Times executive editor Dean Baquet concerning the earlier revelation. [read post]
22 Jul 2017, 10:30 am
This week on the Lawfare Podcast, Jack Goldsmith interviews Graham Allison at the Hoover Book Soiree about Allison's new book, Destined for War: Can America and China Escape Thucydides's Trap? [read post]
22 Jul 2017, 4:09 am
Jack Goldsmith responded, disagreeing with Wittes’s position on resignation. [read post]
21 Jul 2017, 12:41 pm
What does the world look like today if you’re Robert Mueller? [read post]
21 Jul 2017, 11:54 am
Jack Goldsmith examined the interview’s implications for the independence of the Justice Department. [read post]
20 Jul 2017, 11:00 am
The most important book ever written on presidential impeachment is only 69 pages long. [read post]
20 Jul 2017, 8:30 am
Ben suggests the DOJ officials should resign in protest; Jack Goldsmith answers that this would be counterproductive and that the most appropriate strongest response would be for all concerned in senior law enforcement to just do their jobs. [read post]
