Search for: "Jackson v. Clark" Results 81 - 100 of 227
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
28 Mar 2017, 6:34 am by INFORRM
Non-monetary remedies are often as important, if not more, than damages, as was made clear by Tugendhat J in Clarke v Bain [2008] EWHC 2636 (QB): “Defamation actions are not primarily about recovering money damages, but about vindication of a claimant’s reputation. [read post]
1 Mar 2017, 9:30 am by Legal Beagle
  In a separate opinion (with which I agree) Lady Clark rejects an argument that there are insufficient relevant averments of any loss suffered by the pursuer (HC). [read post]
19 May 2016, 3:22 am by INFORRM
Ashley Hurst is a Partner specialising in media and internet disputes at Osborne Clarke LLP [read post]
16 Mar 2016, 4:00 am by Administrator
Jackson v Mayerle, 2016 ONSC 1556 8. [read post]
13 Aug 2015, 2:00 am by Sam Claydon, Olswang LLP
  Lord Clarke gave a dissenting judgment, with which Lady Hale agreed. [read post]
24 Apr 2015, 8:00 am by Dan Ernst
Dayton, University of Connecticut, and Sharon V. [read post]
17 Mar 2015, 12:31 pm by INFORRM
Judgment The leading judgment was given by Jackson LJ (with whom Ryder and Christopher Clarke LJJ agreed). [read post]
8 Feb 2015, 4:23 pm by INFORRM
On 11 February 2015 the Court of Appeal  (Jackson, Ryder and Christopher Clarke LJJ) will hand down judgment in the case Cruddas v Calvert, which was heard on 9, 10 and 11 December 2014. [read post]
1 Feb 2015, 4:06 pm by INFORRM
Judgments The following reserved judgment in media law cases are outstanding: R (Evans) v HM Attorney-General, heard 24 and 25 November 2014 (UK Supreme Court) Rufus v Elliott, heard 10 December 2014 (McCombe and Sharp LJJ and Mitting J) Cruddas v Calvert, heard 9, 10 and 11 December 2014 (Jackson, Ryder and Christopher Clarke LJJ) OPO v MLA, heard 19 and 20 January 2015 (UK Supreme Court) Murray v Associated… [read post]
25 Jan 2015, 4:04 pm by INFORRM
  He has posts about the cases of Cripps v Vakras and Lower Murray Urban and Rural Water Corporation v Di Masi. [read post]