Search for: "Jackson v. Green et al" Results 21 - 40 of 52
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
18 Aug 2011, 11:10 pm by Christa Culver
LangstonDocket: 10-1244Issue(s): Whether a court of appeals violates the sufficiency-of-the-evidence test laid out in Jackson v. [read post]
18 May 2009, 5:24 am
(IP Dragon) China and UK to fast track green patent applications, according to British IP minister (IAM) China IP protection. [read post]
12 Mar 2012, 8:13 am by Ronald Collins
Jackson (1969) (being a sampling of his judicial opinions). [read post]
14 Jun 2007, 12:34 pm
Greene Ramifications on the discoverability principle The issue of whether ignorance of, or mistake of the extent of, injury is an appropriate basis for postponing a limitation period was considered by the Supreme Court of Canada in Peixeiro v. [read post]
5 May 2019, 4:41 pm by INFORRM
  The Greens Senator is suing over comments made by a former senator. [read post]
27 Feb 2009, 7:00 am
(ITC 337 Law Blog) Clean Energy Patent Index finds 2008 was record year (Green Patent Blog) Reinstating patents after failure to pay maintenance fee (Patently-O) Federal Circuit judges at five major conferences (Hal Wegner) Who invented the automobile, Mr President? [read post]
7 Jul 2023, 1:03 pm by Ryan Goodman
Jackson Distinguished University Professor, University of Rochester), Brendan Nyhan (James O. [read post]
22 Dec 2010, 11:36 am by stevemehta
HUGH CASSIDY et al., Defendants, Cross-Complainants, and Respondents, WILLIAM STRAW, Cross-Defendant and Appellant. [read post]
22 Dec 2010, 11:36 am by stevemehta
HUGH CASSIDY et al., Defendants, Cross-Complainants, and Respondents, WILLIAM STRAW, Cross-Defendant and Appellant. [read post]
5 Jun 2017, 1:39 pm by Jamie Baker
Spece Jr. et al., (Implicit) Consent to Intimacy, 50 IND. [read post]
21 Nov 2008, 1:36 pm
(IPKat) EU favours disclosure of computer patents before standards are set (Intellectual Property Watch) Trade Marks Court of First Instance finds RAUTARUUKKI fails to satisfy acquired distinctiveness criterion: Rautaruukki Oyj v OHIM (Class 46) Court of First Instance finds original signature of famous Italian lutist Antonio Stradivari, in arte Stradivarius, of the 17th century, cannot be read by relevant consumers: T‑340/06 (Catch Us If You Can!!!) [read post]