Search for: "Jackson v. Thompson" Results 41 - 60 of 108
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
4 Mar 2020, 2:10 pm by Adam Feldman
Not counting her statement in the court’s per curiam decision in Thompson v. [read post]
18 Oct 2017, 2:22 am by Giesela Ruehl
Vedanta has focused their argument on the fact that Article 4 of the Brussels I Regulation Recast does not automatically allow an English-domiciled parent company to be sued in England and, despite the CJEU’s ruling in Owusu v Jackson, there is always discretion as to whether the English court should allow the claims to be tried in England. [read post]
11 Feb 2014, 8:09 am
It then goes on to cite fair use as "the same law that allows Weird Al Yankovic to use the music from Michael Jackson's 'Beat It' in his parody song 'Eat It'" (see here).Except that, of course, Dumb Starbucks is no ‘Eat It’. [read post]
29 May 2013, 11:36 am by John Elwood
The Court also relisted in Thompson v. [read post]
6 Jul 2020, 3:38 am by Edith Roberts
At Take Care, Scott Skinner-Thompson and Kate Levine argue that even after Bostock v. [read post]
22 Aug 2007, 11:50 am
Board of Com'rs of County of Jackson, Kansas, 2002 WL 596137 (D. [read post]
17 Mar 2019, 5:35 pm by INFORRM
Butt v Secretary of State for the Home Department, heard 17 October 2018 (Underhill V-P, Sharp LJ and Sir Rupert Jackson). [read post]
11 Mar 2008, 8:46 am
Mitchell, No. 06-516 Conviction for aggravated identity theft is reversed where defendant did not couple his use of the name "Marcus Jackson" a sufficient amount of correct, distinguishing information to identify a specific Marcus Jackson, as required by the statute. [read post]