Search for: "Jaclyn Belczyk"
Results 21 - 40
of 73
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
10 Dec 2014, 7:56 am
” Coverage of the decision in Warger comes from Jaclyn Belczyk of JURIST. [read post]
16 Jun 2015, 4:25 am
Kevin Johnson covered the decision for this blog, with other coverage coming from NPR’s Nina Totenberg and Jaclyn Belczyk of JURIST. [read post]
29 May 2013, 7:51 am
Jaclyn Belczyk of Jurist covers two of yesterday’s grants, in Rosemond v. [read post]
10 Jun 2016, 3:59 am
” Other coverage comes from NPR’s Nina Totenberg, Tony Mauro at Law.com (subscription or registration required), Jaclyn Belczyk of JURIST, Richard Wolf of USA Today, and Stephanie Mencimer of Mother Jones. [read post]
30 Apr 2015, 3:06 am
Lyle Denniston covered the arguments for this blog, with other coverage coming from NPR’s Nina Totenberg, Tony Mauro for the Supreme Court Brief (subscription required), Marcia Coyle in the Supreme Court Brief (subscription required), Jess Bravin in The Wall Street Journal, and Jaclyn Belczyk at JURIST. [read post]
28 May 2014, 4:19 am
I provided initial reporting on the decision for this blog (with more to come later today); other coverage comes from Jaclyn Belczyk of JURIST and Matthew L.M. [read post]
28 Apr 2015, 4:55 pm
Reilly and Jennifer Bendery at Huffington Post, David Kurtz at Talking Points Memo, Josh Gerstein at Politico, Jaclyn Belczyk at JURIST, and Bill Chappell at NPR. [read post]
3 Oct 2011, 9:16 pm
Original Article Related Article 10/03/2011 By Jaclyn Belczyk The US Supreme Court opened its 2011 term Monday with oral arguments (PDF) in two cases. [read post]
22 Apr 2014, 6:02 pm
Early coverage in the first case, a First Amendment challenge to an Ohio law that criminalizes false statements in political campaigns, comes from Jaclyn Belczyk of Jurist, Paige Winfield Cunningham of Politico, Joan Biskupic of Reuters, Sam Hananel of the Associated Press, and Deirdre Shesgreen of USA Today. [read post]
16 Mar 2016, 7:05 pm
Merrick Garland’s nomination continues to generate coverage, which comes from Phil Helsel, Corky Siemaszko and Erik Ortiz of NBC News, Harper Neidig of The Hill, Ariane de Vogue and Tami Luhby of CNN, as well as Eugene Scott, Carl Hulse of The New York Times, Lawrence Hurley of Reuters, Sara Randazzo of The Wall Street Journal, David Fahrenthold, Tom Hamburger and Rosalind Helderman of The Washington Post, Jaclyn Belczyk at Jurist, Ben German and Alex Rogers at National… [read post]
9 Dec 2015, 2:30 pm
Savage of the Los Angeles Times, Jaclyn Belczyk at Jurist, Sam Baker at National Journal, Mark Sherman of the Associated Press, Chris Geidner of Buzzfeed, Josh Gerstein and Kimberly Hefling of Politico, Nina Totenberg of NPR, Daniel Fisher at Forbes, Ralph Haurwitz at My Statesman, Greg Stohr for Bloomberg View, Tierney Sneed at Talking Points Memo, and Mark Walsh at Education Week. [read post]
5 Nov 2013, 4:56 am
Jaclyn Belczyk covered both cases for JURIST. [read post]
25 Apr 2012, 6:24 am
Scott Dodson analyzes the opinion for this blog, with other coverage coming from Jaclyn Belczyk at JURIST, Douglas A. [read post]
7 Jun 2016, 6:58 am
Himmelreich comes from Steven Schwinn for this blog and Jaclyn Belczyk of JURIST, while coverage of the decision in Ross v. [read post]
6 Mar 2012, 6:30 am
The Associated Press, Jaclyn Belczyk of JURIST, David G. [read post]
13 Jun 2014, 4:16 am
NPR’s Nina Totenberg covered Justice Kennedy’s opinion for the Court, with other coverage coming from Jaclyn Belczyk of JURIST. [read post]
17 Jun 2014, 5:33 am
Coverage of both grants comes from Jaclyn Belczyk of JURIST, There were also several noteworthy denials of review. [read post]
10 Oct 2013, 7:18 am
Jaclyn Belczyk reports briefly on both cases for JURIST. [read post]
10 Jul 2013, 5:44 am
And at JURIST, Jaclyn Belczyk reports on the emergency petition filed by the Electronic Privacy Information Center challenging the NSA’s global surveillance program. [read post]
5 Nov 2014, 4:46 am
Jaclyn Belczyk covered both cases for JURIST, while at ISCOTUSnow Edward Lee predicts the winners in both cases based on the number of questions at oral argument. [read post]
