Search for: "Jacobs v. Major" Results 1 - 20 of 492
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
10 Dec 2006, 8:10 am
Defendant is developing major high-rises in NYC right now and does development nationwide. [read post]
10 Jun 2009, 11:32 am
Former clinic student and recent Stanford Law School graduate Josh Friedman discusses Monday’s decision in US v. [read post]
11 Aug 2014, 9:56 am by Jacob Sapochnick
In this video Attorney Jacob J Sapochnick Esq. clarifies the differences between the EB5 Regional Center process and the individual EB5  project The major advantage of the regional center as compared with an individual EB-5 investment is that indirect employment creation is allowable. [read post]
9 Oct 2007, 5:27 am
Canada at para. 40 explaining the majority opinion's new construction of s. 43. 5:13 Jacob cites Foundation for Children, Youth and the Law v. [read post]
19 Jul 2007, 6:15 am
However, the majority leading judgment came down to not wanting to sacrifice any general principles (Peruvian Guano being much-quoted) for the sake of the special case of patent disputes.How to hide a leaf here, and more Peruvian Guano here. [read post]
22 Apr 2013, 6:39 am by Second Circuit Civil Rights Blog
That issue brought about a slugfest in the Second Circuit last week.The case is Poventud v. [read post]
27 Jun 2014, 10:15 am by Native American Rights Fund
Nowlin (Major Crimes Act) * State Courts Bulletin featured: Cayuga Nation v. [read post]
19 Feb 2015, 2:08 pm
 Eventually, Junior reaches the age of majority and files a lawsuit against Lujan in California, represented by Girardi Keese, that claims that Lujan conspired with others to fraudulently increase his contingent fee from 38 percent to 56 percent. [read post]
25 Feb 2015, 3:13 am by Amy Howe
  Jeremy Jacobs reports for Greenwire that “[a] majority of the justices held that Nebraska knowingly violated an interstate compact governing the river, depriving Kansas of water that should have flowed over the states’ border. [read post]
24 Aug 2015, 9:12 pm by Ben Rubin
 Writing the decision for the majority, Chief Justice Roberts distinguished the raisin farmer’s situation from the oyster farmer’s situation addressed in Leonard & Leonard v. [read post]